“We all know what happens when men betray their country. But what happens when a country betrays its men?”-Revilo P. Oliver
Neo-liberalism is fraught with contradiction. It decries “racism” yet singles out whites for blood libel. It celebrates democracy but undermines elected officials, manipulates elections, ignores results, and even sanctions the invasion of sovereign nations and the toppling of regimes if the results are not to the ruling class’s satisfaction. It advocates for minority rights—unless those minorities happen to be whites in former African colonies or beleaguered Christians in places like Egypt, Nigeria, and Syria. If Hispanics happen to be mass shooters such as the Jewish-Hispanic Nikolas Cruz, then they are dubbed by the media “white Hispanic,” a term that entered the lexicon with George Zimmerman. The term’s purpose is clear in much the same way that Hispanics are classed as white in criminal statistics as perpetrators but often treated as non-white when they are victims; similarly, they find themselves classed as non-white in affirmative action and college admissions processes.
Other examples abound: it’s perfectly natural for a young boy to play with dolls but should he opt for army men, that’s toxic. Believe all women so long as the accusations are politically expedient. Ignore the mass rape of white women by “migrants” across a prone Europe or by grievance-minded blacks or illegal aliens in America. Despite our sexual dimorphism, there are multitudinous genders, whilst race remains at once a “social construct” and totally fixed. Tolerate the intolerable, make endless war, call rapacious capitalism “social justice,” ad infinitum. While you are harangued, attacked, and everything else up to and including being driven to extinction, you are simultaneously subject to pleas of compassion and tolerance, and vagaries referencing something called “our values.” What, exactly, those are is never specified, but they seem to involve anal sex and student loan debt.
Contemporary “culture” is an open sewer. Beyond the tribal mating rituals and shouting buffoonery that passes for music and the proliferation of racially-ambiguous queer “superheroes,” we have witnessed the normalization of all that was once taboo. Major presidential candidates seem chiefly concerned with reparations and infanticide while the country drowns in Third World parasites, debt, depression, and addiction. For a cool quarter-million dollars, women matriculate to the Cultural Marxist re-education camps formerly known as universities, where they learn to despise their cultural inheritance, their stable up-bringing, their race, and their own biological predispositions and become saddled with crippling debt for the privilege.
White women used to be the gold standard by which all others were held to—their grace, class, and statuesque beauty were only replicable by the artistic masters who adhered to classical antiquity’s aesthetic of symmetry and proportion. From the way they dressed to the way they carried themselves, white women were rightly the envy of all others. As with all of the deepest corruptions, their bringing low through pornography, feminism, “body positivity,” and other damaging propaganda initially happened slowly, but as with the other corrosive elements of our contemporary society, if you can call it that, within the past decade, the descent into the fetid swamp of Septic Planet has only accelerated.
Giving women control of society simply means it will eventually be run by some other group’s men. Feminists make common cause with the same rape-prone groups who would dismantle the protections they currently enjoy, endeavoring to emasculate and estrange the one group who would actually stand up for them against the coming dhimmitude: white men. One need look no further than the allegations levied against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and those levied against Keith “Hakim” Ellison, the man who symbolically used Thomas Jefferson’s Koran to be sworn into the Senate, spitting in the face of the Historic American Nation while most were too ignorant of the significance of this gesture to even realize it. Much of the problem lies in the fact that our people don’t even know who they are anymore, thanks to relentless propaganda in the media and in schools, a culture of consumerism and instant gratification, and a general dumbing-down of our discourse.
We have a negative definition—we know who we’re not—and that is intolerant and able to think for ourselves. “Bigotry has no place here”…unless it’s directed at straight white males and, increasingly, straight white women. Now that the demographic replacement is approaching its advanced stages, the white women who haven’t become bloated grotesqueries, rug-munchers, or trannies are now of no further use to the “Coalition of the Fringes”—just ask the New York Times (and pay special attention to *who* wrote that article and whose *interests* they might represent). For now the gays and bi and trans and species-less have a home simply because the creation of still more grievance groups with which to hound and pound the (shrinking) beleaguered American majority is beneficial to the “elites.”
The Left has the ability to moralize—though their morality is a kind of anti-morality, or inversion of traditional Western values—simply because they have the power to do so. They have this power because they control all of the institutions. The use of the military is apparently only to spread the joys of rampant consumerism and sex changes, not for defending the country’s borders from invasion, so maybe its diminished capacity as a bunch of amorphous non-binaries is a good thing. The few nationalist hold-outs will have a much easier time resisting the Zio-American regime change machine. What a pitiful state of affairs that you have to root against your own country as the bad guys. The American people are good and honest people, if a bit naïve, but we have no political representation. As James Mason writes:
Because of the self-imposed rules the traditional Right has always played by, they are so far removed from what’s happening as to realistically not count. For effective purposes in national affairs, there are only two camps: status quo, middle-of-the-road Conservatives and “progressive,” death-wish liberals. A true “right” is in no way represented. This plus the fact that Whites have absolutely no real representation makes for probably the most lop-sided political scene of any country ever in history.
I think we should extend Mason’s assessment of this state of affairs to all of the Western nations—from Once-Great Britain to Canada to New Zealand—that have embraced neo-liberalism. As I stated above, the much-vaunted “democracy” of neo-liberalism is only democratic when it aligns with the goals and desires of the ruling class. Otherwise it is an impediment to “progress” and the will of the people is subverted (think: Brexit, the Mueller investigation of so-called Russian Collusion in the election of Donald Trump, and even the attempt to depose Bashar al-Assad). Majority rule is conveniently supported when there is a white minority to destroy, such as in South Africa or Rhodesia, but minority rights are the order of the day in white nations—until those white populations are themselves a minority, in which case the script will flip.
Mob-rule—ochlocracy—is the inevitable product of a dumb and diverse “democracy.” Set loose on their fellow citizens, the mob does the dirty work while the “elites” remain ensconced in power. As John Stuart Mill presaged in the mid-19th century, there is perhaps no greater tyranny than that of the society itself as tyrant:
Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyran—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannizing are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself.
Even if it were not a majority, it could be a majority of voters (which the Electoral College is meant to guard against, for example) or a sufficiently active and vocal minority who exert pressure on one’s personal life, place of employment, et cetera. Additionally, this kind of invasive tyranny need not be limited to a body of people. We see corporations engaging in this kind of behavior all of the time. Frankly the multi-nationals and the big banks are a far greater threat to our freedom than the government. Anywhere power is concentrated, there is potential for abuse. This was one of the great insights of the Founding Fathers, who specifically structured our government to avoid this—and with a very different population in mind than the one currently comprising our market né nation.
It was a great system for its time and place, but with the growth of the private sector into the Leviathan it’s become, with no respect for national borders and boundaries and with the profit-motive as its sole raison d’etre, concentrated power in the hands of the state—a state run by and for its own people, also known as the FUBU Principle—is the only thing that can counter-act globalism. The state is the only apparatus that can challenge the globally-interconnected network of Big Money and while it remains in thrall to these interests it cannot serve ours.
 “75% of all lesbians were overweight or obese. In fact, they found lesbian women were more likely to be overweight and obese compared to any other female sexual orientation group.”: https://www.medicaldaily.com/obesity-epidemic-gay-bisexual-women-get-healthy-391397