Melting Pot or Toilet Bowl?
The liberals were absolutely verklempt when blacks and Hispanics defeated Proposition 8. Why can’t they do our bidding and get with the program? We like to joke that NPCs lack agency, but the Left really does regard its pet projects as agency-less, which of course nullifies any notions of “democracy.” They figured out how to “hack” democracy; they hysterically trumpet consent and the on-going violation of “black bodies,” but they’re perfectly content to rape your nation with foreigners without your consent, violating its territorial integrity and sovereignty. Literal rape is okay, too, so long as it is being committed by protected classes against whites. Rape in Sweden is now up 1,666% since 1975. Shift the context to America: In 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man. What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man. Lawrence Auster writes:
Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America…There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.
White eradication has to be their ultimate goal. Anushka Asthana writes in The Guardian with no apparent agenda that, “Color-blind love is the mark of a healthy and dynamic society,” using only the anecdotal evidence of the fact that she is in an interracial marriage as evidence to prove her hypothesis. The “ideal” of a mongrelized population having “less racism” is belied by the mystery-meat experiment that is Brazil, where by some metrics the country is approximately 50% mixed-race; far from racial issues being non-existent in a country with a white plurality and a whole lot of what the blacks call “swirling,” race remains an intractable obstacle to paradisal post-racial utopianism. In fact, Brazil is fraught with racial tension and is one of the most violent countries on earth. Growing diversity in Asthana’s adopted nation of Great Britain has seen its quality of life decline dramatically in exact correlation with its increasing diversity. Her prescription is to just have all the native Britons and their racially-distinct replacements mix and mix until we have heaven-on-earth. But besides the many impediments to a “café con leche” future society oft masturbated-to by many an ardent Leftist, most people do not want to date outside their own race, and furthermore, the more diverse an area becomes, the less interaction there is. Simply put, their own project is confounded by itself as people will inevitably self-segregate. Consider that the more diverse the city, the more segregated. Oy vey! As the Washington Post laments: “the United States is on track to be a majority-minority nation by 2044. But census data show most of our neighbors are the same race.” It’s not like preferring your own is biologically hard-wired or anything or that ethnic diversity destroys social cohesion.
Channeling her inner Anushka Asthana, Lionel Shriver believes Vin Diesel-ing the population may well short-circuit the dreaded identity politics game (for whites of course). As Kevin MacDonald writes:
While I would love to live in a European-derived individualist society, under such circumstances it is suicidal to pursue an individualist strategy in the current circumstances...If present trends continue, the individualist culture of the West will become a distant memory as these new peoples assume power in collaboration with White social justice warriors...The faith of the individualist is that these newcomers will readily become good Westerners and that the ethnic politics that looms so large now will become a thing of the past—a fateful gamble that will end in disaster as politics becomes increasingly racialized.
Joanne Kaufman, writing in the New York Times, declares that the sudden preponderance of interracial couples in television commercials is reflective of “our modern society,” but the Jewish Kaufman puts the cart before the horse here. In this instance, the agenda is to force life to imitate “art.” Forcing school integration at gun-point has been gang-busters so why not those we pair-bond with? From City Lab:
Although 11 percent of white newlyweds are now married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, white people are still the least likely of all major racial or ethnic groups to intermarry. Black newlyweds, meanwhile, have seen the most dramatic increases of any group, from 5 percent in 1980 to 18 percent today. The gap between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas, however, “is driven entirely by whites,” according to the report… 83 percent of newlyweds in non-metro areas are white, compared to 62 percent in metro areas.
Does the incessant race-mixing propaganda known as “advertising” on television make sense now? This is also just one more reason why the rural population of the United States is under sustained attack.
It is a multi-tiered process. On one level, you have the stoking of resentment through group economic competition and the constant reminder of historical grievances real, exaggerated, and imagined. On another, you have endless propaganda centered on what blacks call “swirling,” or mixed-race couples and children. What’s interesting to note is that many blacks are becoming aware of the ceaseless race-mixing agenda, and object to it as the propaganda that it is:
Liberal black femininsects write all sorts of think pieces about how the media makes non-blacks think certain ways about blacks, but simultaneously think media indoctrination of black women as white men's whores is natural and "progressive."
Television is steady trying to push this interracial dating agenda down our throats. Y’all gotta chill. Most of us want a black partner. Foh.
Yes, all white and black swirl love on every show and every commercial. Wife and I were just talking about the agenda lately. Even my 10 year old notices it like in “A Wrinkle In Time”. Why did the dad and boyfriend both have to be white?
All of this is quite ironic when you consider the constant bitching on Black Twitter that “representation matters.” I can’t say I was amused seeing a charcoal-skinned Heimdall (“the whitest of the gods”) in the Thor films, and furthermore A Wrinkle in Time was authored by a white woman with white characters for an implicitly white audience—the latest Hollywood production is what the Left calls “cultural appropriation.” Nevertheless, the point is well-taken; to quote Harold Cruse, “Among the many myths life and history have imposed on Negroes…is the myth that the Negroes’ best friend is the Jew.” The constant ferment and anti-white animus being stoked in the black community is in no small part attributable to Jewish propaganda, with Hollywood as but one arm. Yes, blacks are obviously more violent as a rule, but their violence would stay largely internecine if they weren’t galvanized into attacking whites, and if so many whites weren’t effectively dis-armed, guilted, and de-racinated into weak submission. The propaganda seen in Hollywood and increasingly in advertisements these days serves another purpose, though; as Dontell Jackson writes:
We are all simply pawns to the Jews who have no other use for us beyond being a source of profit to them and a weapon that can be used to help destroy whites, who they see as their sworn enemies, by encouraging us to breed with them until there are no longer any whites left.
It's being done to erase group differences and create a mixed population that has one less in-group affinity, which is an easier population to control. With outliers such as Northeast Asians and Igbo excepted, it also results in a regression to the IQ mean, which also corresponds with decreased impulse control, higher time preference, et cetera. Additionally, blacks and especially whites are the least likely to date outside their race. In the meantime, while their future wage-slave class is being engineered, Jewish Boston University professor Marilyn Halter believes the mountain of research and historical evidence that diversity plus proximity equals conflict to be erroneous; speaking specifically in the American context and the projection of white Americans to become a minority versus a non-white majority by mid-century:
“Future projections about the impact of a minority white nation don’t take into account the changing meaning of whiteness. I know that the research is attempting to measure how people react to the idea of a future white minority, but the very concept is so oversimplified and inaccurate, I think it invalidates the findings.…I do not think that greater diversity leads to more intolerance….I have found no evidence whatsoever of backsliding on racial tolerance in the marketplace, whether from the marketers or the consumer side of the equation,” says Halter, whose 2000 book Shopping for Identity: The Marketing of Ethnicity is about how American businesses have tailored their products to immigrant consumers in recent decades. She also argues that the growth of mixed-race Americans—more than nine million checked two or more race categories on the 2010 US Census, up 32 percent from 2000, she says—means “it will be increasingly irrelevant to divide up the electorate into white, black, and brown.”
Meanwhile, over in Israel, Halter’s co-ethno-religionists forcibly sterilize Ethiopian Jews and use HIAS to covertly export Africans to the West. Yet curiously the Jews are some of the most vociferous supporters of mass migration of non-whites here in the West. The hypocrisy is stunning but disturbingly par for the course. This double standard applies to virtually every aspect of social, financial, and political policies: good for the goyim=bad; good for the Jews=good. If this seems overly reductionist, I suggest you continue to read on. From Rhodes to Toledo to Babylon to Alexandria to London to Berlin to New York, everywhere the Jews have massed in appreciable numbers has been damaged and sold out to the highest bidder. Were that not the case, but over one thousand historical expulsions say otherwise. Quoting Joe Sobran:
Hilaire Belloc’s book The Jews, published in 1922, should be required reading for anyone who wants to understand what used to be frankly called (even by Jews) “the Jewish problem.” Belloc addressed the problem from the Christian point of view, but he did it in an even-handed way, acknowledging that the vices of the Jews are often the obverse of their virtues. He wrote at a time when “Jewish Bolshevism,” based in Russia, menaced Christendom. The Jewish Communists in every country seemed to embody, in extreme form, every bad trait ascribed to the Jews: hatred of the majority and its religion, duplicity, materialism, lust for power. The Jews’ long survival is often called “miraculous.” It would seem so — literally. Judaism is based on divine revelation, and the highly tribal and patriarchal Mosaic law, so contrary to every precept of modern liberalism, has created a race of people who have refused assimilation to their surrounding populations over many centuries.
Their extreme in-group preferences and out-group hostilities have been well-documented by Dr. Kevin MacDonald among others, and a cursory observation of anywhere the Jews cluster (think of New York City or Los Angeles/Hollywood here in the United States) reveals a similar pattern of relentless tribal nepotism and refusal to assimilate/integrate. The surrounding culture must change to their needs instead, and to our great detriment, we have done so. Many on the hard Right and Left, however, see past the façade, however, and rightly understand that Jewish influence is rarely, if ever, positive for anyone but the Jews. If it is positive, it is incidental. The conditioning to worship at the altar of Judaism is actually weaker on the Left, enthralled as neocons and “normie conservatives” are to the Israel lobby. To quote Richard Houck:
John Podhoretz, Bill Kristol, David Frum, Ben Shapiro, Jennifer Rubin, and Jonah Goldberg are all opponents of any semblance of an America First policy. They favor mass immigration, foreign wars, foreign aid, and seem to wholly embrace the fact that White Europeans are becoming a minority in our own homelands, all while they support incredibly strict immigration (my note: and eugenic) policies for their own homeland of Israel.
Conservatives have been conditioned to “lose with dignity” while the Left is allowed to impose its warped morality on the culture. What it means in effect is the more broken, defective, and/or morally depraved one is, the greater the aura of “virtue” surrounding them. The same goes for the more alien a group is, which helps explain the fetishizing of the hijab and other Moslem practices. It is Jewish glue that holds together the Island of Misfits Toys known as the Freaks and Geeks and their assorted non-white totems and pets. As Ann Coulter aptly summed-up the Democrat Party “platform”:
I mean you have the Muslims and the Jews and the various exotic sexual groups and the black church ladies with the college queers ... you must hate white men. It's the one thing they have in common.
Returning to Joe Sobran:
Is there a “Jewish problem” in the United States today? In the media age, Jews prevail in the media — in television news, punditry, major newspapers, and Hollywood entertainment. They also constitute a powerful lobby, devoted to a range of liberal causes: feminism, “civil rights,” legal abortion, banning religion from public places — whatever seems to irritate the Christian population. Many ethnic Jews (as well as many nominal but effectively apostate Christians) still carry what might be called the Bolshevik gene code. But Jews are so powerful in this country that any mention of the Jewish angle in liberalism is taboo, whereas the interests of “the Christian Right” are freely reported, often with scornful overtones. As I have reason to know, a journalist may endanger his career by discussing Jewish interests in any light except a highly favorable one. An especially vivid illustration is provided by the media’s concerted hate campaign against Pat Buchanan. Jewish power is such that even Jews in the media are themselves afraid of it.
It is at this intersection of Jewish power and the neo-liberal anti-morality that we are currently positioned. To have transgressed is to have found oneself to have violated the most sacred tenets of neo-liberalism—tenets which are, incidentally, never quite “fixed,” and certainly flexible, at least superficially. Once again, in order to fully understand, say, Bolshevism in 1920, or neo-liberalism nearly one hundred years later, the primary defining characteristic is who is behind the ideology and how they twist it to serve their group interests. Certainly greed and lust for power are the primary drivers behind both Jew and Gentile alike’s determination to implement these universalist ideologies and systems of organization, but Jewish loathing of the Gentile and extreme in-group preference also underpin so much of “our” ruling class’s behavior. Neo-liberalism, as communism before, is simply the latest preferred method to establish Jewish supremacy.
 Some might say a natural law—the Law of 13 do 50: http://www.unz.com/sbpdl/blacks-are-13-of-london-englands-population-blacks-represent-50-of-the-murder-suspects-in-london/