s0mdqqoempexvirate0o.jpg

Hi.

Prepare your anus, you’re about to get a red pill suppository.

12 Years a Slave: The Making of a Modern Woman

12 Years a Slave: The Making of a Modern Woman

“I never thought of myself as a person who would be going through husbands…”-Overheard at work

“I’m not ‘man-splaining,’ I’m saying something that is obviously true.”-Tucker Carlson

Nothing spells empowerment quite like being a wage slave to global capital. Go to college, gain twenty pounds, take a dozen or two (or more) guys to bed, maybe get a masters, learn to loathe your family—especially your father—and the culture you grew up in, move to the city with your six figures in debt to start work in HR for GloboHomo, Inc., struggle to pay a two thousand dollar a month rent for a glorified broom closet, gain ten to twenty more pounds, take another dozen or two (or more) men to bed, experiment with a few chicks, wake up and you’re thirty, swiping through Tinder for the man of your dreams, no kids, a thousand miles from your immediate family, making $40,000 a year. You’ll have to get some new clothes soon, the waistband is getting a little tight on your jeans (again). Some hair-dye, too, because you’ve noticed a few grays around the temples. You haven’t been able to pay off your student loan debt yet because the interest keeps accumulating. You were passed up for a promotion at work in favor of a mulatto tranny who’s been there a quarter of the time you have.

The odds of you finding the man of your dreams on Tinder are pretty long; the top 78% of women are vying for the top 20% of men, which has serious ramifications for both sexes. The Gini coefficient for the “Tinder economy” is 0.58, which means that it has a higher inequality than 95% of the world’s national economies. Most likely you are a third-string, drunken Thursday night booty call. Maybe you miraculously find your man, but the more sexual partners you’ve had, the less likely you are to be satisfied in your marriage.

Maybe you decide to rebel against daddy and act out. 97% of white women who have a child with a black man give birth to said child out of wedlock; 92% of all biracial children with black fathers are born out of wedlock and 82% end up on government assistance. According to one study, spousal homicide incidence rates were 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages relative to intraracial ones in a study conducted for the three-year period 1979-1981. White females married to black males are 12.4 times more likely to be murdered by their husbands than white females married to white males.[1] Maybe you decided to forgo children and channel your maternal instincts into “social justice” and other destructive nonsense with your non-binary partner. Maybe you use abortion as birth control.[2]

Maybe you ended up staying in graduate school, you work in HR or payroll for your alma mater, and you wind up marrying the beta TA from your gender studies class. You have one trans kid and another adopted one from Zimbabwe or Thailand. He adjuncts one class at the local community college, does all the shopping at Whole Foods, and takes care of the kids, who will both grow up to hate you. You “bring home the tofu.” Women who are the sole or primary wage-earners experience elevated levels of endogenous testosterone. There is ample research of “life imitating art,” so to speak, as it pertains to “gender socialization.”[3]

study by the University of Chicago found that when women out-earned their husbands, the chances that the couple felt they were in a “happy marriage” fell 6 percentage points. A wife out-earning a husband also resulted in lower testosterone for the husband, higher testosterone for the wife (!), and greater incidence rates of divorce.[4] That is if the woman bothered to get married in the first place. What incentive does she have, really? By the end of her life, the average woman will have a negative fiscal impact of $150,000. As Nicolas Kilsdonk-Gervais informs:

Men and women spend approximately the same amount in both education and health… With the exception of the age group between 45-59 (a 15 year span) years old, women cost more to the state than the tax they provide. In contrast, men generate more tax revenue than they cost between 23 and 65 (a 43 year span). In the brief period in which women generate more or as much tax money than they consume, men outscore them by at least 3 times… While feminists are demonizing men for benefiting from all liberties and rights they have constructed, they have oddly remained silent over the fact that anonymous male tax payers are paying women to exist. Read that sentence again. The fact that feminists want a stronger government is not a coincidence. While historically, women had to choose a wealthy husband for resources, they can now stay single, be lesbians, marry a poor man, or use the sperm bank, and the state will still transfer male taxes to them. Interestingly, within 10 years of women’s suffrage, the government doubled their tax revenue and expenditure in the USA.[5]

I never got the findom fetish—you pay money for the “privilege” of a woman to cuckold and mock you. Don’t we do that already indulging harpies’ and cat lady’s Eat. Pray. Love. fantasies with our taxes? Essentially, women are still practicing hypergamy, but with no greater sugar-daddy than the state, what chance has an average man got? Women want to marry above their station, and when there are four college-educated women for every three college-educated men in the dating pool, this becomes virtually impossible, especially when manufacturing and other blue-collar jobs that supplied men with a steady income are being nuked in this country. Consider that from 2000 to 2016, rural America’s aggregate share of GDP declined from 46% to 36%. As Alex Berezow reports, this decline is hitting blue-collar men in particular extraordinarily hard:

The deadliest occupational group for men was "construction and extraction," with a suicide rate of 53.2 per 100,000 in 2015. For women, the deadliest group was "arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media," with a suicide rate of 15.6 per 100,000.[6]

Men and women were never meant to be pitted in competition, but rather to function as complementary units to raise families. When we push against nature’s will, the results are predictably disastrous. Our society has been so atomized, even the most basic building blocks are part of the rubble. If we have any hope at all, men and women must stop viewing each other as adversaries, we must rebuild the traditional family, and men and women must also find positive relationships of the same sex for mutual support in a dying civilization, so that we may forge durable bonds that survive the coming darkness and ultimately rebuild.


[1] https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.79.5.595

[2] Simone Veil, Jewish former French health minister responsible for leading the drive to legalize abortion in France was quoted as saying: “We are out to destroy the family. The best way to do that is by attacking its weakest member, the unborn child.”

[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4653185/

[4] Historically, marriages in which wives were more educated than their husbands faced a higher risk of divorce, compared to couples in which husbands were more highly-educated (Schwartz and Han 2014). 

[5] http://archive.is/xwarB#selection-385.33-425.103 ; “In nearly all age groups, women receive more tax than they give”

[6] https://www.acsh.org/news/2018/11/16/suicide-rates-sex-and-occupation-13604

Homo Globicus

Homo Globicus

Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto

Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto