“The Holocaust” as Presented by Your Local CBS Affiliate
The Holocaust has become a religion for the largely atheistic Jews, as well as very convenient weapon to wield against any who might *notice* that the Jews are not behaving in good faith. The phrase “Holocaust Denier” evokes the sense of one who refuses to believe—and in this sense it is a question of belief because six million Jews did not, by any stretch of the imagination, die in World War II, therefore one must have faith and believe uncritically in such a fantastically huge number, and one supposedly achieved in the most inefficient and outlandish fashion possible. Does one really accept that the Germans, so precise almost to the point of idiosyncricity that other Europeans jokingly call them “Ant Fuckers,” would divert necessary resources to make lampshades and soap out of a potential work-force? I’m not saying the Jews weren’t interned in camps and made to do forced labor, they were, but rather that the whole mythos built up around the Holocaust is that of pure legend or religion, if you like. It is unsurprising that, as Richard E. Harwood wrote:
So far as is known, the first accusation against the Germans of the mass murder of Jews in war-time Europe was made by the Polish Jew Rafael Lemkin in his book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, published in New York in 1943. Somewhat coincidentally, Lemkin was later to draw up the U.N. Genocide Convention, which seeks to outlaw “racialism.”
Is the incessant push for Western nations to take in an unlimited number of “refugees” starting to make sense to you now? Guilt may be the most potent political weapon a group or groups may use to further their interests, particularly if it involves attempting to coerce another group or groups to voluntarily relinquish power, and the king of all contemporary guilt trips is the Holocaust. Curiously for a people supposedly so scarred by genocide, at least to hear them tell it, the nation of Israel denies the Armenian genocide, which by any rational metric would strip them of any moral authority they may claim, to say nothing of that which is lorded over the goyim through ceaseless propaganda. As both Christians and Jews have been relentlessly hounded and attacked by Moslems for 1,400 years, you might think there would be some commiseration between the persecuted, but alas, it seems the Jews have cornered the market on suffering. We know the Jews have never intentionally inflicted suffering on others, though, right? It’s not like they were chiefly responsible for killing as many as twelve million Ukrainians in the Holodomor, double the claim of Six Million Jews in the Holocaust. This is of course before considering the massive loss of life across the Jewish-controlled USSR from the October Revolution until late in Stalin’s reign.
These figures are virtually un-touched by academics and pundits alike, and in those rare instances where the true depths of communist depravity are mentioned, they never approach the Pavlov’s dogs’ reaction of instant pearl-clutching that the Holocaust evokes—and the ethno-religious component is never discussed. Conversely, the ethno-religious component of the Holocaust is never allowed to move from the forefront of everyone’s consciousness at any time. The Holocaust has become the central myth of the Jewish people, their conduit to radically altering the societies in which they reside, indubitably for the worse. The factuality of the Holocaust is, if you’ll pardon the pun, so ironclad you’ll be jailed in at least seventeen countries for even attempting to “revise down” the figures of this so-called Holocaust.
One tried-and-true tactic to prevent any interrogation of the myth is to conflate Holocaust revisionism with “denial.” Of course it happened; no one with any sense is debating that Jews were viewed as political enemies by the Nazi state and detained in camps. Calling someone like David Irving a “denier,” however, is extremely disingenuous and is meant to discredit a universally-respected historian (until his little run-in with Jewish mythology, anyway) and the body of research he conducted. Similar tactics have been used against the Institute for Historical Review, Austin App, Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, Arno J. Mayer, and Ernst Zundel, among others. Judaism’s strange gods be damned, we’re going to wade into a little “un-packing” of their central myth here together.
A crucial distinction must be made here between concentration camps and extermination camps. Concentration camps are merely domestic “holding pens” for groups considered to be hostile to the interests of the nation at war. Prior to World War II there was considerable precedent for the use of concentration camps, and they have been used since. The only evidence—and this is hotly contested—for conscious extermination of Jews resides in the camps in Poland, where David Cole pinpoints documented evidence from the summer of 1943 referencing the “termination” of 2.4 million Jews. Conversely, Dr. Kubovy, director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Tel-Aviv claims that not a single order for extermination exists from Hitler, Himmler, Heydrich or Goering.
The neutral Red Cross report from after the war put the number of dead from the camps in Germany and German-occupied territory outside of Soviet control at less than 300,000, a figure which includes Jew and Gentile alike. These deaths were due mostly to supply shortages caused by intensive Allied bombing and rampant illnesses that claimed the lives of Jew and Gentile alike in the dark days at the end of the war. Most photographs of alleged Nazi atrocities are actually from the Allies’ horrific fire-bombing of Dresden, and most written “evidence” of gas chambers and the extermination camps came from unverified sources behind the Iron Curtain. Only seven years after the initial publication of The Diary of Anne Frank, a New York Supreme Court case established that the book was a hoax. Therefore, considering the body of evidence in its totality, at its absolute maximum the so-called “Holocaust” claimed less than half of the mythologized Six Million. According to at least one rabbi, the number is less than one million, which is a lower number than the Armenian Genocide that Israel denies, and one-twelfth the number of Gentiles killed or starved by Jews in the Holodomor. Richard E. Harwood offers a number of salient data points that contradict the official Holocaust narrative and re-inforce the fact that fewer than half the number of Jews supposedly killed in the Holocaust were, in fact, killed:
· Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February 22nd, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000 and a maximum of 18,700,000...15-1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that the world’s Jews produced seven million births,
almost doubling their numbers, in the space of ten years.
· According to Chambers Encyclopaedia the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was 6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number were exterminated. But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss publication employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United States. This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948. Of these emigrants, approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939...In Colliers magazine, June 9th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained that “2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis,” but our lower estimates probably more accurate...A figure, consequently, of around 3 million Jews in German- occupied Europe is as accurate as the available emigration statistics will allow.
· Professor Rassinier concludes in Le Drame des juifs européens that the
number of Jewish casualties during the Second World War could not have exceeded 1,200,000, and he notes that this has finally been accepted as valid by the World Centre of Contemporary Jewish Documentation at Paris. However, he regards such a figure as a maximum limit, and refers to the lower estimate of 896,892 casualties in a study of the same problem by the Jewish statistician Raul Hilberg. Of great concern to Professor Rassinier is the way in which the extermination legend is deliberately exploited for political and financial advantage, and in this he finds Israel and the
Soviet Union to be in concert. He notes how, after 1950, an avalanche of fabricated extermination literature appeared under the stamp of two organisations, so remarkably synchronised in their activities that one might well believe them to have been contrived in partnership. One was the “Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and Criminals” established under Communist auspices at Warsaw, and the other, the “World Centre of
Contemporary Jewish Documentation” at Paris and Tel-Aviv. Their publications seem to appear at favourable moments in the political climate.
· 2,050,000 German civilians were killed in Allied air raids and forced repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source, Die Tat of Zurich (January 19th, 1955), in a survey of all Second World War casualties based on figures of the International Red Cross, put the “Loss of victims of persecution because of politics, race or religion who died in prisons and
concentration camps between 1939 and 1945” at 300,000, not all of whom were Jews, and this figure seems the most accurate assessment.
· [There were] a growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the number of these claimants registered with the West
German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000 (Aufbau, June 30th, 1965). Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a resounding
confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second World War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands. Surely this is enough grief for the Jewish people? Who has the right to compound it with vast imaginary slaughter, marking with eternal shame a great European nation, as well as wringing fraudulent monetary compensation from them?
In his terrific book Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Carlos W. Porter recounts the sheer volume of outrageous accusations leveled against the Nazis, including:
· Vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with “atomic energy”;
· Killing 840,000 Russian POW’s at Sachsenhausen concentration camp (in one month, with special pedal-driven brain-bashing machines, no less), then disposing of them in mobile [sic] crematoria;
· Torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed “Tango of Death” in Lvov;
· Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka;
· Electrocuting them en masse at Belzec;
· Making not only lampshades and soap (my note: the bars of soap lie was first advanced by Rabbi Stephen Wise in 1942 in the United States, well before any Allied troops had even seen any of these camps) but also handbags, driving gloves, book bindings, saddles, riding breeches, gloves, house slippers, etc. from the remains of their victims;
· Killing prisoners and concentration camp inmates for everything from having armpit hair to soiled underclothing.
Naturally these “crimes” are no longer repeated, for they are so outlandish not even a liberal would believe them, though we still hear about ovens and gas chambers, no credible evidence of which exists. The Nazis were so diabolical, they converted a resort in the Czech Republic (Terezin) into a camp full of artists, musicians, teachers, scientists, and young children; the Red Cross visited the camp and ultimately dubbed it “The Paradise Camp.” “One mother remembers seeing the bakery filled with goods for the event”; from Terezin: Voices from the Holocaust (page 38), ‘Life in the Boys’ Home,’ April 1942 to 1944: “We were given talks by teachers, we played games and had our chores, and were under strict discipline…We published a newsmagazine once a week. At certain times, we were allowed to go out of school to walk around and visit our parents.” Simply horrific. The Germans were most concerned with expatriating Jews as opposed to any kind of extermination; they simply did not want their corrosive influence within the Reich:
The founder of political Zionism in the 19th century, Theodore Herzl, in his work The Jewish State, had originally conceived of Madagascar as a national homeland for the Jews, and this possibility was seriously studied by the Nazis...The Germans were not original in proposing Jewish emigration to Madagascar; the Polish Government had already considered the scheme in respect of their own Jewish population, and in 1937 they sent the Michael Lepecki expedition to Madagascar, accompanied by Jewish representatives, to investigate the problems involved…It is very significant, however, that certain Jews were quick to interpret these policies of internal discrimination as equivalent to extermination itself. A 1936 anti German propaganda book by Leon Feuchtwanger and others entitled Der Gelbe Fleck: Die Ausrotung von 500,000 deutschen Juden (The Yellow Spot: The Extermination of 500,000 German Jews, Paris 1936), presents a typical example. Despite its baselessness in fact, the annihilation of the Jews is discussed from the first pages—straightforward emigration being regarded as the physical “extermination” of German Jewry. The Nazi concentration camps for political prisoners are also seen as potential instruments of genocide, and special reference is made to the 100 Jews still detained in Dachau in 1936, of whom 60 had been there since 1933. A further example was the sensational book by the German-Jewish Communist, Hans Beimler, called Four Weeks in the Hands of Hitler’s Hell Hounds: The Nazi Murder Camp of Dachau...The encouragement of Jewish emigration should not be confused with the purpose of concentration camps in pre war Germany. These were used for the detention of political opponents and subversives—principally liberals, Social Democrats and Communists of all kinds, of whom a proportion were Jews such as Hans Beimler. Unlike the millions enslaved in the Soviet Union, the German concentration camp population was always small; Reitlinger admits that between 1934 and 1938 it seldom exceeded 20,000 throughout the whole of Germany, and the number of Jews was never more than 3,000. (The SS: Alibi of a Nation, London, 1956, page 253).
The point here is that no other historical event has been rendered “unresearchable” through various legalities that put any downward revision in deaths on par with the supposed genocide itself. This is a remarkable achievement on the part of the Jews, but it is also a testament to how gullible we as Westerners have become. If the Six Million figure was absolutely true, why prevent any inquiry at all? Surely the evidence is incontrovertible.
Of real cause for concern for the agenda of globalist Jewry is a recent poll that found 34% of Americans believe “substantially less” than six million Jews died during the Holocaust, and 70% believe that people care less about the Holocaust than they used to. There is such a thing as over-saturation, but the big-brained Jews seem either not to realize this, or they are running out of cards to play. There is only so much mileage one can get out of a “genocide” before the tires are bald.
Meanwhile, over in Israel, legislation has officially entrenched Jewish Apartheid and ended an pretense of being “the only democracy in the Middle East.” How curious that the most vociferous proponents of mass immigration here in America are suspiciously silent about this recent development among those whose lives are worth 10,000 times more than ours or more, as Ron Unz reports that 10,000 might just be a low-ball figure:
Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine, and indeed obligatory, to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.,
Such a belief seems to greatly inform the profound arrogance exhibited by both the neo-conservatives and the “J-Left” as they are colloquially called. Certainly there is an evolved intense ethnocentricity among many Jews, especially contrasted with whites, but how to explain said arrogance, or the very obvious proclivity to subvert, pervert, and deceive? Certainly there is a basis for deception rooted in various traditional rituals which are designed to obscure certain actions or even trick God. A people who would deign to trick their deity (and worshipping and eating Satan’s shit, per Martin Luther) would think nothing of tricking the subhuman goyim. In 2010, Israel’s preeminent Saphardic rabbi explicitly stated that non-Jews exist exclusively to serve Jews. Religious Jews have a particularly negative opinion of Christians and Christ in particular. Returning to Unz:
Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethleham, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination…These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance…If the Gentile population became aware of these Jewish religious beliefs and the behaviors they promote, major problems for Jews might develop, so an elaborate methodology of subterfuge, concealment, and dissimulation has come into being over the many centuries to minimize this possibility, especially including the mistranslation of sacred texts or the complete exclusion of crucial sections.
An analogue here would be the Islamic taqqiyah, which doctrinally allows for the deception of non-Moslems in order to advance the interests of the faith. Such duplicitousness is abhorrent to Western Christians, and thus many have a very difficult time accepting that other groups and faiths might deceive with impunity. This is a tough pill to swallow for the fairness-oriented progeny of Europe where, as the blacks say, “word is bond.” Furthermore, the invention of the term “racism” by a Jew, Magnus Hirschfeld, is particularly ironic when you consider the following, again as reported by Unz:
According to mainstream Talmudic doctrine, black Africans are traditionally placed somewhere between people and monkeys in their intrinsic nature…[Israel] Shahak notes that the numerous American rabbis who so eagerly worked with Martin Luther King, Jr. and other black Civil Rights leaders during the 1950s and 1960s strictly concealed their religious beliefs while denouncing American society for its cruel racism, presumably seeking to achieve a political quid pro quo beneficial to Jewish interests from America’s substantial black population.
Israeli Apartheid makes a lot more sense in this context. In another delicious irony, “Shahak also emphasizes the utterly totalitarian nature of traditional Jewish society, in which rabbis held the power of life and death over their congregants”; I wonder what all of the mainstream pundits, Democrats, and Never Trumpers screeching about how Donald Trump is imperiling “our democracy” feel about this. Regarding the entitled of the new Jewish aristocracy ensconced in power, Unz offers the following:
Why has there been so little public discussion? I believe one factor is that over the years and the decades, our dominant media organs of news and entertainment have successfully conditioned most Americans to suffer a sort of mental allergic reaction to topics sensitive to Jews, which leads to all sorts of issues being considered absolutely out of bounds. With America’s very powerful Jewish elites thereby insulated from almost all public scrutiny, Jewish arrogance and misbehavior remain largely unchecked and can increase completely without limit.
The Jewish fingerprints on this country are almost exclusively negative. From the opioid epidemic and the Jewish-owned Purdue Pharmacy primarily responsible, to nation-fracturing mass Third World immigration and an obsessive preoccupation with “diversity,” the broken and discarded Anglo-Saxon watches his country evaporate before his very eyes. The Jewish Unz commits the atrocity of “noticing”:
That all the powerful mass-media technologies of our modern world–film, radio, and television–had been invented and pioneered by Gentiles, mostly of Anglo-Saxon origin, but in each case control was seized by ruthless Jewish businessmen, who sometimes destroyed the lives and careers of those creators. By the 1950s, nearly all of America’s leading concentrations of electronic media power—with the sole major exception of Disney Studios (my note: which is now Jewish-controlled)—were solidly in Jewish hands. In an open society such as ours, these are the central levers of political influence, and over the next generation or so, America’s long-dominant and heavily Anglo-Saxon ruling elite was replaced by a mostly Jewish one.
Of course this imported over-class’s greed knows no bounds, but it is also eminently hostile toward the native American founding stock, and to the indigenous people they are trying to supplant across the West. Let’s just call it what it is: a war on Western civilization and its people.
 Also from Harwood: According to one American judge who was a member of the Commission of Inquiry, Edward van Roden, in 137 out of the 139 cases he investigated at Nuremberg, the German officer in question had been sexually maimed for life by his interrogators.
 The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 89-92.
 Also of note: the Israelis have, to date, harvested the organs from at least 18,000 dead Syrians from the war they helped instigate. https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/07/28/israel-harvested-18000-organs-from-dead-syrians-during-the-war/; A 2001 BBC report disclosed that Israel per capita stands as the world’s largest recipient nation for organ transplants yet is the country with the fewest organ donors.