We All Float Down Here
“What’s really tricky about this conversation, and hard to grapple with, is that Jews in America have done the things…that they’re being accused of doing by these white nationalists.”-Jonathan Weisman
In 2018—Dave Rubin’s “Year of Unusual Alliances”—a bunch of Jews and shabbos goyim got together and told us just how bad identity politics are…for whites only. Truly remarkable stuff, that. We know that you are not allowed to criticize the Jews in any way shape or form, or highlight their role in endeavoring to turn all white nations into “multi-cultural” hell-holes. Certainly their “Holocaust” is the only one worth acknowledging, and it is their eternal “victim card” to play. “Anti-Semitic” incidents are at a record-high in Britain, corresponding exactly to the increased Moslem population. Similar cries in pain throughout Europe aid in the Jews’ victim narrative, but once they’ve altered the composition of our ancestral homeland beyond recognition, they can just go kiss the dirt in Israel safe behind their big wall. Plans are in motion to fast-track 200,000 Jews out of France and into Israel. God forbid Australia try to do the same—on a much smaller scale—for persecuted white South Africans! No, what defines the West is tolerance and pluralism, according to Rubin. As one member of the “Intellectual Dark Web” Ben Shapiro tells it:
Jerusalem and Athens built America… The USSR rejected Judeo-Christian values and Greek natural law, substituting a new utopian vision of “social justice” – and they starved and slaughtered tens of millions of human beings. The Nazis rejected Judeo-Christian values and Greek natural law, and they shoved children into gas chambers. Venezuela rejects Judeo-Christian values and Greek natural law, and citizens of their oil-rich nation have been reduced to eating dogs…We believe we can reject Judeo-Christian values and Greek natural law and satisfy ourselves with intersectionality, or scientific materialism, or progressive politics, or authoritarian governance, or nationalistic solidarity. We can’t.
There is so much sophistry in just that one paragraph from Shapiro, it’s hard to know where exactly to begin. This is more than just patently false, it is a deliberate re-casting of the Western world as the progeny first and foremost of the Levantine parasites eating away at the moral fabric of the West from within and using it for the sole benefit of their small ethno-religious group, and secondly as the failed experiment of democracy which in its Athenian application enfranchised precisely one-tenth of the city’s population. If anything, in the American context, it was Rome and London that built America, but arguing that the West is a set of values and not an extension of its people—who, by the way, do not include Shapiro’s tribe—borrows from the idea of the “proposition nation” first introduced by another Jew, Ben Wattenberg. The USSR was controlled by Jews and those tens of millions starved and slaughtered were ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, and others, so far from rejecting the “values” of Jerusalem, I would say the USSR did a damn fine job of embodying them. World Jewry declared war on the National Socialist regime in Germany twice before the onset of World War II, and were responsible for manipulating the Americans into both World Wars, the construction of the economic system that brought Germany to its knees, the decadent and depraved Weimar Republic, using Britain as a spear-head in both wars for the Balfour Declaration and the opening-up of its colonial possessions to materialism as new “markets,” and all told the deaths of probably over one hundred million whites as a result of these two global cataclysms. Venezuela is now squarely in the cross-hairs of predatory Jewish capitalists in the IMF and American war profiteers (many of them Jewish) screaming for regime change in Venezuela.
The “values” of Jerusalem apparently include illegally occupying lands of sovereign nations, staging false flag attacks, Balkanizing and de-stabilizing the entire Middle East, facilitating huge amounts of hostile Third Worlders’ entry into the West, engaging in international terrorism, attacking US naval vessels, funding ISIS, running massive pedophilia and human trafficking rings, stealing US military intelligence, putting troops in Brazil for possible military intervention in Venezuela—which has rejected the squalid materialism of neo-liberalism, though in precisely the wrong way—and extorting American taxpayers to pay for its defense. Furthermore, Shapiro disingenuously links progressive politics and intersectionality with nationalistic solidarity, which is not only directly opposed to the former two, but is essential if the West has any prayer (pardon the pun) of surviving. Shapiro is totally on board with Israeli nationalism, however. Finally, the very construction of “Judeo-Christian” is ridiculous; the former group crucified and rejected the Messiah, and holds that he is boiling for all eternity in either feces or semen, depending on the translation. They also triggered several wars that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Christians across the Middle East, and they regard their lives as anywhere from ten thousand to infinitely more valuable than the goyim. Pick an ailment in the Western world, and you’ll find a disproportionate number of Jews involved. Shapiro is the worst kind of charlatan, but his behavior is par for the course.
This is not to exempt Westerners from blame for falling for the rouse, however. We are the ones who worship at the altar of materialism and use tolerance as an excuse for paralysis. We are the ones presently engaged in selling ourselves out and extinguishing our very own ethnic homelands. We are the ones allowing ourselves to die for global Jewry in distant deserts to affect the Yinon Plan. We are the ones allowing our nations to be gutted by mass migration, groveling before our would-be conquerors. It’s pathetic. As Anton Fedyashin and Anita Kondoyanidi write:
With the loss of willpower, the Western democracies could offer the world nothing but “concessions, attempts to gain time, and betrayal.” At the root of this malady lay “rationalistic humanism or humanistic autonomy” that produced a suicidal form of “anthropocentricity.” By championing this ideology, the Renaissance had ignored the intrinsic evil in man while simultaneously making him the universal point of reference. Even the American Founding Fathers’ moral assumptions disappeared under the pressure of state secularism, producing materialist legalism, Solzhenitsyn argued. The twentieth century’s technological achievements did not redeem its “moral poverty.” Uncontrolled freedom encouraged licentiousness manifesting itself in the prevalence of “pornography, crime, and horror” in popular culture. “Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil,” Solzhenitsyn suggested.
Behind a smokescreen of “democracy” the Establishment colludes to gain total control—for good. Just as Judaism and Bolshevism are synonymous, so too are Judaism and predatory capitalism. Despite their miniscule percentage of the global population, Jews are approaching twelve percent of its billionaires! Most of the richest Jews in the world are also actively working to undermine Western nations through various fronts and pet causes (Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Sheldon Adelson, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Larry Page, Steve Ballmer—who incidentally was granted permission to purchase the Los Angeles Clippers basketball franchise by Jewish commissioner Adam Silver after he stripped former owner Donald Sterling of the team following the release of a tape by his mistress containing the utterance of some naughty words). Just as with Rubin’s “Dark Web,” many of the rest of the world’s richest goyim are completely on board with the globalist neo-liberal project as well, such as Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and the Koch brothers. Globalism isn’t about compassion for “refugees,” most of whom are simply economic migrants—and especially since many of the same people advocating for their mass importation are those funding the wars causing actual refugees—but rather the erasure of borders to facilitate access to markets and ease of trade, as well as the movement of people and goods.
The entire cultural default of most of the globe has been set to liberalism, and any nations that are not totally on board with allowing themselves to be run by Goldman Sachs, the IMF, the World Bank, et cetera must be brought to heel. Step one, purchase the “company”; step two, consolidate. With Putin’s move to ultimately nationalize the banks in Russia, the annexation of the Crimea, the possible absorption of Transnistria, and the impending Belarussian Anschluss, ethnic Russians have gripped the third rail and have issued an emphatic rejection of globalism. Will this be “allowed” by global capital? They are trying their damnedest to make sure self-determined nations become a thing of the past, and the entire Western media apparatus is working overtime to vilify Russia and lionize a morally bankrupt and utterly decrepit Woke Capital axis bent on impressing every corner of the globe into neo-liberal serfdom. Twenty years ago, just seven nations did not have a central bank tied into the neo-liberal globalist system: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. Gaddafi was removed for proposing a rival gold-backed currency. Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded. Sudan had itself a civil war, and the breakaway state of South Sudan’s central bank came under globalist control. Today, just five nations do not have branches of the globally-connected central banking system: North Korea, Cuba, Sudan, Iran, and Syria. The latter two are allied with Russia, which may potentially move to a new gold-backed currency and nationalize its banks. Who have been the most vilified nations on earth by the Western media in that time span? We can see which nations have been invaded, de-stabilized, “brought to the negotiating table,” or liberalized in that same time span. Think hard on this: which nations are being positioned currently as “the greatest threats to democracy”?
One “unusual alliance” not mentioned by Rubin, but one which would be eminently advantageous to us at this juncture, would be a kind of Red-Green-Brown alliance designed specifically to undermine the globalist establishment. Though our prescriptions are different, our diagnosis is the same: the beating heart of this monster is their control of the money supply and their spread of neo-liberalism to every last corner of the globe. As Gottfried Feder wrote:
It is not to be overlooked that the international collaboration of the great moneypowers represents a completely new phenomenon. We have no parallel for this in history. International obligations of a monetary nature were practically unknown. Only with the rising global economy, with general global commerce, did the idea of international interest-economy establish itself, and here we touch the deepest root, here we have hit upon the innermost source of strength from which the Golden International draws its irresistible power.
The far Left is not necessarily wrong when they say that the Establishment, spear-headed by the US and the UK, cannot let a nation leave its orbit, as evidenced from the above list and now including Venezuela. But it’s not that neo-liberals fear socialism necessarily, but rather they fear national self-determination (also consider the “Domino Theory” regarding communism in Southeast Asia as the justification for US involvement in Vietnam). Off-brand communism is not, and will never be, the answer, but it would behoove us to make strange bedfellows in the short- and medium-term in order to work against what is the ultimate threat to all races, nations, and alternate ideologies: neo-liberalism. Let’s make 2019 the actual “Year of Unusual Alliances.”