Prepare your anus, you’re about to get a red pill suppository.

America the Judenfrei

America the Judenfrei

“Again the Roman customs and principles regarding money transactions are better than those of the Carthaginians. In the view of the latter nothing is disgraceful that makes for gain; with the former nothing is more disgraceful than to receive bribes and to make profit by improper means.”-Polybius

 “Greed is good!”-Insider trader Ivan Boesky, the inspiration for the character Gordon Gekko in Wall Street

Is there a common thread running between these names: Ivan Boesky, Michael Dell, Michael Milken, George Soros, Carl Icahn, Steven A. Cohen, Larry Ellison, Michael Steinberg, Jonathan Hollander, Barry Minkow, Jordan Belfort, Bernie Madoff, Andrew Fastow, and Samuel D. Waskal? If you guessed insider trading and/or securities fraud and money laundering, you’d be right! They also all *happen* to be Jewish! You may be interested to know that nine of MutualFunds.com’s top ten “biggest stock market villains” are either Jewish or non-white. It is no secret that Jews exert an enormously out-sized influence not just within the financial sector but on the financial sector as policy-makers and educators. Writes George Salaman:

Inside Job, the award-winning 2010 documentary about Wall Street’s role in the financial meltdown of 2008… made the acquaintance of generals and captains from the finance industry’s golden triangle: economists at our elite universities, executives from investment banks, and officials from government agencies. Many of them had moved easily and regularly through the triangle’s revolving doors, and many of them were Jewish. Among them: Fred Mishkin, professor at the Columbia Business School who served on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and as consultant to the International Monetary Fund; Arthur Levitt, chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as well as adviser to the Carlyle Group and policy advisor to Goldman Sachs; Lawrence Summers, professor of economics and president at Harvard University, chief economist for the World Bank, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, and managing partner at the D.E. Shaw & Company hedge fund; Harvard economist Martin Feldstein, who sat on the board of American International Group (AIG) as it imploded from its credit default swaps and needed a government bailout. Inside Job also featured the godfather of the “greed is good” ideology that has been elevated by Wall Street since the Reagan presidency: Alan Greenspan, chair of the Federal Reserve, consultant to Pacific Investment Management Co., and senior advisor to Deutsche Bank. As one historian of our age of greed observed, Greenspan believed that the “unleashing of unregulated self-interest... was a sufficient condition for prosperity.”[1]

“But why drag in the well-known fact that Wall Street firms are staffed, especially in top positions, by a disproportionally high number of Jews?” asks George Salaman before continuing:

By becoming insiders in America's capitalist establishment— "like everyone else, only more so," as Chaim Weizmann once put it — Jews have paid a steep price in terms of Jewish ethical identity… It’s in this idolatrous, commercial society America’s Jews have gained insider status. The good news is therefore the bad news as well. Alan Dershowitz, who never misses an opportunity for a bit of hyperbole, said about today’s American Jews: “We are the WASPs.” Larry Summers explained to Elizabeth Warren just what such insider-ness means: “Insiders (also) understand one unbreakable rule: They don’t criticize other insiders.”… Wall Street’s own psychotherapist, Jonathan Alpert, saw in the financiers’ behavior “a blatant disregard for the impact their actions might have on society,” behavior that “extends to the very top” of their organizations. How they did what they did was likely a combination of reckless but profitable risk-taking and, in the words of Judge Jed Rakoff, “fraudulent practices, of dubious mortgages portrayed as sound risks and packaged into ever more esoteric financial instruments, the fundamental weaknesses of which were intentionally obscured.” The judge points out that the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission used “variants of the word ‘fraud’ no fewer than 157 times in its final report.” “Listen, what can we believe in?” lamented one Wall Streeter interviewed for the film. "There’s nothing we can trust anymore.” He’s bemoaning what he and his fellow hucksters and fraudster have done, that is given their lives over to a nihilistic power. Hannah Arendt saw it coming: “the development of commercial society... with the triumphal victory of exchange value over use value, first introduced the principle of interchangeability, then the relativization, and finally the devaluation of all values.”… Too many American Jews, in my view, have become people “like us” (my note: he means ethnically nepotistic). They participate in the class war as generals or as foot soldiers who benefit from Wall Street’s long march of greed, which is continuing on the same path and remains still without substantial restraints from without or within.[2]

Though Salaman laments the sacrifice of Jewish ethical identity for gaining insider status in the modern-day Sodom and Gomorrah that is the United States, he neglects the fact that it was the Jews themselves who were instrumental in corrupting America in this fashion and, worse still, using their influence to spread their corrupted vision across the globe. The tale of the 20th and 21st centuries has been Jews using Wall Street, the City of London, and other major financial hubs and institutions to advance what George Lincoln Rockwell called “their anvil of capitalist exploitation and their hammer of Communist revolution and slaughter”; this continues the tried-and-true tactic of Jews using their financial pull to advance their particular group interests for millennia. At the beginning of the 20th century, it was Jacob Schiff[3] of Kuhn, Loeb, and Co. who was the primary financier of the Bolsheviks, not just for the October Revolution, but for their revolutionary activity from 1905 and on, though other Jewish financial interests such as the Warburgs and Rothschilds generated funds for the Bolsheviks as well. The Swedish Jew Olof Aschberg also provided substantial funding in exchange for extensive access to the Soviet markets and for the ability to found the first international Soviet bank in 1922, Roskombank. Carl Marklund writes:

These activities earned Asch-berg the sobriquet “the red banker” and provided him with a first-rate opportunity to get to know some of the leading figures of European as well as Russian socialism. By the early 1920s, Aschberg had established a banking network between Moscow, Stockholm, and Berlin, eventually relocating to Paris in the late 1920s. After the Nazi takeover in Germany, the French capital replaced Berlin as the hub of “international solidarity” work of the international labor movement. Aschberg soon engaged himself in several anti-fascist and anti-racist networks operating out of Paris.[4]

Indeed, it appears that the entirety or near-entirety of the financial and corporate power structure of the West had colluded to set in motion the tragic events of the past one hundred years. Though the Jewish connection in particular is worth highlighting, we cannot forget that Gentile capitalists were and are also complicit. Quoting G. Edward Griffin from The Creature from Jekyll Island:

In 1911 the St. Louis Dispatch published a cartoon by a Bolshevik named Robert Minor. Minor was later to be arrested in Tsarist Russia for revolutionary activities and in fact was himself bankrolled by famous Wall Street financiers. Since we may safely assume, that he knew his topic well, his cartoon is of great historical importance. It portrays Karl Marx with a book entitled Socialism under his arm, standing amid a cheering crowd on Wall Street. Gathered around and greeting him with enthusiastic handshakes are characters in silk hats identified as John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank, Morgan partner George W. Perkins and Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.[5]

Professor Antony Sutton writes:

President Woodrow Wilson was the fairy godmother, who provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to "carry forward" the revolution...At the same time careful State Department bureaucrats, concerned about such revolutionaries entering Russia, were unilaterally attempting to tighten up passport procedures.[6]

Returning to Griffin:

It is now a matter of record, that [William Boyce] Thompson syndicated the purchase on Wall Street of Russian bonds in the amount of ten million roubles. (Hagedorn, p. 192) In addition, he gave over two million roubles to Aleksandr Kerensky for propaganda purposes inside Russia and with J.P. Morgan gave the rouble equivalent of one million dollars to the Bolsheviks for the spreading of revolutionary propaganda outside of Russia, particularly in Germany and Austria. (Sutton: Revolution, pp. 83, 91.) It was the agitation made possible by this funding, that led to the abortive German Spartacus Revolt of 1918. (See article "W.B. Thompson, Red Cross Donor, Believes Party Misrepresented" in the Washington Post of Feb. 2, 1918)[7]

Kerry Bolton helpfully provides additional context:

These protestations of patriotic motivations ring hollow. International banking is precisely what it is called–international, or globalist as such forms of capitalism are now called. Not only have these banking forms and other forms of big business had overlapping directorships and investments for generations, but they are often related through intermarriage. While Max Warburg of the Warburg banking house in Germany advised the Kaiser and while the German Government arranged for funding and safe passage of Lenin and his entourage from Switzerland across Germany to Russia; his brother Paul, a partner of Jacob Schiff’s at Wall Street, looked after the family interests in New York. The primary factor that was behind the bankers’ support for the Bolsheviks whether from London, New York, Stockholm, or Berlin, was to open up the underdeveloped resources of Russia to the world market, just as in our own day George Soros, the money speculator, funds the so-called “color revolutions” to bring about “regime change” that facilitates the opening up of resources to global exploitation. Hence there can no longer be any doubt that international capital a plays a major role in fomenting revolutions, because Soros plays the well-known modern-day equivalent of Jacob Schiff… This aim of international finance, whether centered in Germany, England or the USA, to open up Russia to capitalist exploitation by supporting the Bolsheviks, was widely commented on at the time by a diversity of well-informed sources, including Allied intelligence agencies, and of particular interest by two very different individuals, Henry Wickham Steed, editor of The London Times, and Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labor.[8]

The Jews use their influence in order to advance their own interests and enrich themselves and their co-ethno-religionists regardless of the cost to any other ethnic group (though we should not exempt the treasonous Gentile collaborators and profiteers from our ire; in fact, given their betrayal, they are more deserving of it, but this is a topic for another time). Though we’ve long known the usurious Jewish tendencies and intense in-group preference, contemporaneously the evidence continues to mount; according to Max Boot, citing George Soros specifically for his litany of crimes against Western civilization is “like blaming the Jews” (a sentiment reiterated by David Leonhardt who claimed that Senator Chuck Grassley stating the elevator protestors harassing former Senator Jeff Flake were likely on Soros’s payroll “amounts to an anti-Semitic smear”), thereby proving yet again that the Jewish establishment very clearly wants to place itself beyond any and all scrutiny. Given their crimes against not just this country but against humanity itself, that makes perfect sense. Using the Boot-Leonhardt Matrix of Anti-Semitism, an observation or comment that casts even one Jew in a bad light, even if it is factually accurate, is “anti-Semitism,” and what’s more, such an “attack” on one Jew is an attack on all Jews! We already know that globalist is an “anti-Semitic dog-whistle.”

What would really be lost if those Jews who insisted on undermining our national sovereignty were forced to leave? They’re certainly not involved in any of the day-to-day maintenance of this country like farming, factory work, waste disposal, long-haul trucking, and the like. Though the exact numbers are difficult to pin down at present, given many modern parallels with Weimar Germany I believe the following statistic to be illustrative: According to the June 1925 vocational census, while 29.5% of the entire population of the state of Prussia was engaged in agriculture, gardening, stock-rearing (livestock), forestry, and fishing, a paltry 1.74% of all Jews—and less than one percent of immigrant Jews—were engaged in such work. Conversely, while 17.1% of the total population worked in commerce, business, and hospitality, the percentage for Jews was 58.8%. The Board of Directors of the Berlin Stock Exchange was 100% Jewish. 60% of the banks were under Jewish control and 80% of lawyers and judges were Jews. In the Weimar period, Jewish bankers and speculators defrauded the German people of over one hundred million marks. We know in the modern United States that Jews are certainly not invested in the defense of this country; despite being 1.5% of our population, they consist of just 0.3% of the armed forces.

There are more parallels, this time with the Soviet Union. At the beginning of the 1930s, the Jews were 1.8% of the Soviet population but 12–15% of all university students. In the United States, in 1925, over 27% of Harvard University students were Jewish. At its high-watermark in the 1920s, 40% of the student body of Columbia University was Jewish. Though that percentage would decline over the coming decades, by 1967 it was back up to 40%. That same year, the University of Pennsylvania was 40% Jewish; Yale, Harvard, and Cornell were all between 20-25% Jewish; and Dartmouth, Princeton, and Brown were all between 13-20% Jewish. In 1986, Jews were 30% of Yale students. In the year 2010, Jews were nearly one-quarter (24%) of Ivy League students, roughly the same percentage as whites, who were then 63.7% of the US population to Jews’ 1.5%. The Jewish share of Ivy League students has declined somewhat since then, precipitously at Harvard interestingly enough, but according to Hillel International’s figures for 2018, they are still dramatically overrepresented at Ivies like Columbia (24%), Cornell (20%), Penn (17%), Yale (14%), and Brown (14%).

By percentage, not counting the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, American Jewish, Brandeis, and Yeshiva Universities, which have Jewish missions, other top schools where Jews are heavily overrepresented according to Hillel International include Tulane University (43%), Barnard College (33%), Goucher College (31%), LIU-Brooklyn (30%), University of Hartford (30%), Sarah Lawrence College (29%), CUNY Brooklyn (28%), Binghamton University (27%), University of Albany (26%), George Washington University (25%), Queens College (24%), Boston University (22%), University of Maryland (19%), University of Miami (18%), University of Florida (18%), and Vanderbilt University (15%). On a per capita basis, whites are more than five times as likely to achieve Phi Beta Kappa status and the highest academic achievements at Harvard as are Jewish students, complicating the Jewish overachievement narrative and reinforcing the probability that these overrepresentations probably have more to do with ethno-religious nepotism. It also may have something to do with cheating as the recent slew of scandals have revealed. Though they do test at higher IQs than Northeast Asians and whites, mathematically this is not enough to account for the extreme disparities we see particularly in terms of admissions versus academic performance. Further, as Ron Unz explicates:

Evidence that these low Jewish enrollments are due to meritocratic admissions factors rather than merely lack of possible applicants may be seen if we compare different UC campuses. Berkeley and UCLA are the most selective, and at those Jewish enrollment averages about 9.5% or about one-quarter the Asian total; meanwhile, Santa Cruz and Santa Barbara are much less selective, and the Jewish percentages are nearly twice as high and also close to the local Asian figures. Jewish enrollments are also very substantial at the lower-tier California State University system, with numbers being much higher both at CS Northridge than nearby UCLA and at San Diego State compared to UCSD. Large numbers of Jewish students also attend the schools in the lowest-tier community college system as well, such as Pierce College in the San Fernando Valley. If these Jewish students had had higher academic performance, most would almost certainly have selected the much more prestigious University of California campuses.

For the academic year 1968-69, 15-20% of the faculty at the following universities was Jewish: California, Chicago, Harvard, Columbia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Princeton, and the City University of New York. In 1971, 25% of all Ivy League professors were Jewish. While the Dean of Harvard Law School, Jewess Elena Kagan gave over half of her faculty appointments to fellow Jews. According to Chaim Seidler-Feller, today’s leading institutions typically have around a 20% Jewish faculty. Every single major university press now publishes a line of Judaica. We also should not forget that the Frankfurt School found its American home at Columbia.

Regarding presidents, deans, and high-level administrators, in 2011, of the twenty-four senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities, twenty were Jews or were married to Jews. Jews Richard Levin was president of Yale from 1993-2013, Harold Shapiro was president of Princeton from 1988-2001, and David J. Skorton was president of Cornell from 2006-2015, and the current presidents of Penn, Harvard, Princeton, and Yale are Jews as well. Three of Harvard’s four most recent presidents Neil Rudenstine, Larry Summers, and Lawrence Bacow are Jews, and the other, Drew Faust is married to one. Princeton had a string of seven straight Jewish provosts from 1977-2012. Four of Harvard’s last five provosts have been Jewish.

Surely all of this is just a coincidence, right? I mean, the “Intellectual Dark Web” places preeminence on radical individualism and instructs us to acknowledge that to judge others solely by their immutable characteristics is wrong. While this is true to an extent if you have additional information beyond stereotypes/pattern recognition (which is, as Lee Jussim’s research has confirmed, one of the most reliable predictors of behavior) which disconfirms the initial appraisal, blind adherence to “radical individualism” will result in the demise of the “Judeo-Christian values” this so-called “Intellectual Dark Web” is so keen to advance.

The Web’s “radical individualism” is designed to encourage individuals to break free from the group-think paradigm with the end result, however, of being nothing more than a socially-acceptable form of “rebellion.” That this “Dark Web” is almost exclusively Jews—and that their “radical individualism” never extends to their own tribe—is unsurprising. Some have very valuable things to say, and rightly critique the tendency to a collectivist mindset of some on the Left, but all invariably miss the point, either intentionally or unintentionally, that one does not sacrifice their individuality by belonging to a group and identifying with that group. Race, far from being a social construct, is the ultimate group. It is the supra-familial extension of your genes and as such you have a vested interest in your race’s survival. Race and civilization are inextricable. To pretend otherwise is suicidal folly.

[1] https://jewishcurrents.org/editor/wall-street-jewish-ethical-identity/

[2] Ibid.

[3] Schiff was a major contributor to Woodrow Wilson's presidential
campaign and a major advocate for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act.

[4] http://balticworlds.com/the-icons-of-the-red-banker/

[5] http://www.wildboar.net/multilingual/easterneuropean/russian/literature/articles/whofinanced/whofinancedleninandtrotsky.html

[6] Antony C. Sutton, Ph. D.: Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, published by Arlington House in New Rochelle, NY, 1974, p. 25.

[7] http://www.wildboar.net/multilingual/easterneuropean/russian/literature/articles/whofinanced/whofinancedleninandtrotsky.html

[8] https://www.counter-currents.com/2013/10/wall-street-and-the-november-1917-bolshevik-revolution/

The Holo-Costco

The Holo-Costco

Trivial Pursuit

Trivial Pursuit