The End of Democracy
“A citizenship that depends on government largess must inevitably descend into a debased democracy and finally tyranny…The leveling impulse, taken to its ultimate conclusion, has not produced human equality; instead it has destroyed society’s decency and the dignity of its people.”-Byron Roth
“Outside of sports — where the black man is as secure in his domain as the Jew in his — most of the blacks who are celebrated for their ‘achievements’ are political. That is what black ‘leaders’ do: they fight to enlarge the power of the state, narrowing the white man’s freedom and taking his money for racial purposes. The state is of course a coercive and parasitic institution, creating and producing nothing, dispensing to some only what it takes from others — ‘organized plunder,’ as Bastiat called it. Success in politics is nothing to be proud of.”-Joe Sobran
Racial identity (for all but whites), and its hostilities, are on the rise in American politics, unsurprising when you consider Finnish researcher Tatu Vanhanen’s findings of a correlation of .726 between conflict and the degree of diversity in a given area. Consider that on the first day of Democrat control of the House of Representatives, we were treated to the following by their party members: a comparison of President Trump to Adolf Hitler by Representative Hank Johnson; a pledge by Representative Rashida Tlaib that, “We’re gonna impeach the motherfucker”; an introduction of the articles of impeachment against Trump by Representative Brad Sherman; an introduction of a bill to grant Washington, DC (which went 90.8% for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election, 5.1% for various independent candidates, and 4.1% for Donald Trump) statehood by Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton; and the introduction of a bill to abolish the electoral college by Representative Steve Cohen. For those keeping score at home, Johnson is black, Tlaib is a Palestinian-Moslem, Sherman is Jewish, Norton is black, and Cohen is Jewish. Not long after, a bill to abolish ICE was introduced by House Democrats Adriano Espaillat (Dominican), Pramila Jayapal (Indian), and Mark Pocan (gay Jew).
This is the reality of American politics now, a racial spoils system closely managed by a hostile foreign “elite” and the remnants of the Old Guard willing to collaborate for material gain and to stake a claim in the new globalist paradigm. Buffeted from every direction in a sea of alienism, native Americans find themselves ear-marked by the “elites” as casualties of globalism. The importation of high time preference peoples creates more consumption and less saving, and the creation of debt and control of a monetary supply un-tethered to any tangible backing—and un-accountable to the people who are forced to use it—is in the last what this whole house of cards is built on. The “migrants” and assorted Third Worlders may be more violent, but they are mentally more docile. They won’t agitate for independence from governmental encroachment, overreach, and violation of sacred rights the way whites do; there is no tradition of self-reliance or democracy or republicanism or right-to-rule the same way there is among European-derived peoples, which, along with our higher intelligence and creativity, is what makes us more dangerous in the long run.
Our homelands are being fundamentally transformed beyond all recognition, as mass immigration is of course transformative. This is axiomatic, but in contemporary discourse, unmentionable. Whites certainly have no right to their own homelands—migration is a human right! Even the estimable United Nations says so! Read the excerpt below from the document entitled, “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” from the United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division (since deleted) and ask yourself again, “What conspiracy?”:
United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration. Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration (my emphasis) for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.
So there you have it, in black-and-white, the end-game: replacement migration. So yes, you are being replaced, but one-way migration into white and select Northeast Asian societies is a human right. Clearly this is absurd, and to quote Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.” What about the obligation to your fellow countrymen? What about the obligation to your posterity? Many whites have opted out of the latter obligation in refusing to have children, but it’s worth considering that you can’t be a “cool wine aunt” if some thrice-deported illegal runs you over in a crosswalk and takes off leaving you for dead, or a pack of racially-aggrieved blacks decide to gang-rape and kill you. For the rest, what kind of country do you want to leave your children and your children’s children? One that’s healthy, happy, and cohesive, or a squalid, disease-ridden hell-hole?
Whatever your views on democracy—and mine are decidedly negative—it should be self-evident that democracy cannot work in a fractured, tribal environment, and it certainly cannot work without borders. We can consider the nation to be a living organism, much like the human body, where something as simple as the changing composition of gut flora can profoundly alter the body’s overall health, well-being, and even its psychological state. One may recall here the brilliant “My Borders, My Choice” meme, for any immigration without the people’s consent is a gross violation, or rape if you will. For Chris Buskirk and Seth Leibsohn:
Consent is rightly given only to governments that protect [the people’s] right to consent. It cannot mean that anyone has a right to be a citizen of the United States…It also means that citizens have the right to determine who becomes a citizen…A high view of citizenship that includes devotion to protect the value and prerogatives of citizenship is fundamental to the protection and perpetuation of liberty and self-government. This should be uncontroversial, but even with Republican and conservative circles the idea and importance of citizenship—which is exclusionary by nature—is fallen on hard times. Borders must be protected and citizens must come first.
The right-to-rule is neatly summed up by Pliny the Younger: “If he is to rule over all, he must be chosen from all.” All isn’t the world’s wretched refuse or whomever the media convinces us it is our duty to accept and care for in naked paternalism far worse than the much-maligned “White Man’s Burden” of colonialism, financed of course by you. No, it is from the people of the polis the leaders derive their right to rule, and it is those same people who may revoke that right. “Nobody cares about what Donna Brazile has said in [her] book [about the rigging of the Democratic Primary and the cult-like Clinton campaign]. Nobody,” says former Virginia Governor Terry “93 Million Americans Die Every Single Day from Gun Violence” McAuliffe. On his side—the Uni-Party—he’s right. They don’t care about the Constitution, they don’t care about due process, and they certainly don’t care about this country. Their publicly-expressed faux-compassion seemingly knows no bounds unless it is the ravaged white working and middle classes, in which case, no amount of scorn is too much for the beleaguered bedrock of this country.
Non-pathologized whites will not tolerate tyranny. We are mentally and dispositionally an eternal threat to any expression of totalitarianism, be it a tyrannical despot, a permanent bureaucracy, or a cabal of oligarchic neo-liberal bankers, hence the need to de-racinate, marginalize, and ultimately replace the individualistic whites from their traditions and inheritance. The further we are estranged from the fundamental principles of America’s founding, the further we are from understanding what this experiment in self-governance was originally based on, and for whose benefit it exists. The polis stands as a testament to self-government, individual autonomy, and independence. For Revilo P. Oliver:
“Populists” must remember, first of all, that Jeffersonian democracy was not intended for Timbuktoo, Fiji, or Erewhon. It was designed for the thirteen colonies that had just won their independence for a specific people in an historically unique situation. Those colonies came close to being a nation in the primary sense of that word, a natio…formed of persons related by ancestry and birth, ie-a racially homogeneous people.
Globalism is the antithesis of the nation, its cosmopolitan nature belying an origin totally at odds with the European philosophical inheritance. It is alien, it is oppressive, and it is, most crucially, destructive.
The fundamental struggle of our time is globalism versus hereditary nationalism. Much as throughout the previous 8,000 years or so tensions existed between empires and their various constituent tribal or ethnic parts—always dominated by one ruling group, and often a relatively small minority at that—so, too, did the cataclysms of the first half of the twentieth century usher in the era of the “invisible,” or supra-national empire. There is obviously significant over-lap here, and empires that are both financial and traditionally territorially-acquisitive such as China remain in existence, but I am speaking of the predominant mode of power expression and how power organizes and perpetuates itself. The nature of empire has changed somewhat over time, but its essence remains the same—the top-down imposition of social mores and economic conditions by a ruling minority. Now there must always be a minority in charge for optimal governance, but here is the crucial distinction: we are talking about a minority of individuals derived from the indigenous population (optimal) versus an alien minority dictating to the indigenous population (sub-optimal and immoral). Secondarily that minority, or “elite,” may still come at least in part from the indigenous majority, but as Greg Johnson explicates:
Every society is ruled by elites. The only question is whether they rule in the interests of all, or in their own interests. Currently, white nations are ruled by the wealthiest, most powerful, and most diabolically evil elite in human history. When Plato and Aristotle compiled their catalogs of bad forms of government, neither of them imagined a regime so evil that it was dedicated to the replacement of its own population with foreigners.
A genocide by any other name is still a genocide. Cheaper consumer goods do not constitute “progress” and suicidal delusions of “equality” do not bring them any closer to reality. When an organism is threatened, it does not reproduce. Fecundity relies on stability and safety, or else imperviousness to danger and future planning, a decidedly dysgenic characteristic. Since we have both working in tandem, it is little wonder the bottom is dropping out. The “elites” are not just swapping one population for another comparable one, they’re replacing a dynamic and healthy population with a dumb and (politically) docile one. Their acting-out of violent tendencies can easily be confined to the ghettoes and barrios, or else channeled through racial resentment against the host population ear-marked for oblivion. It’s a good deal if you’re one of the fat cats on the top of the totem pole: your assorted Oaxacans, Hondurans, Gambians, and Afghanis are not producing future George Washingtons or George Lincoln Rockwells. They’re producing your future gardeners, crop-pickers, and hyper-consumers. Plus, they produce something even more valuable than their expendable labor: a bonanza of future hyper-consumers and expendable laborers! It’s really quite brilliant, at least in the short-term. All pyramid schemes eventually come crashing down, though, but hey, if the world is going to end in twelve years due to “climate change” as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez believes, you might as well send your consumption into overdrive and buy, buy, buy! In the meantime AOC, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and the sibling-wedding Ilhan Omar will be happy to pose as the feisty and sassy new faces of democracy! With the browning of America and the rising tide of color I guess the Washington Post is right after all: democracy really does die in darkness.