The Naming of the Jew
“I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The White Women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with black women. Thus the White Race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the White means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.”- Rabbi Rabinovich’s 1952 Council of European Rabbis speech
George Soros in an interview with a German magazine in 2014 said, “I’m going to bring down the United States by funding black hate groups. We'll put them into a mental trap and make them blame white people. The black community is the easiest to manipulate.” If you look at the founding of the NAACP, as no less a personage than Marcus Garvey also observed, this is standard practice for the Jews--to stoke racial resentment and to “divide and conquer.” The encouragement of alternate identities and allegiances, such as the “hyphenated Americans” (Mexican-American, African-American, etc.), is only a temporary measure meant to erode the unity and cohesion of the host nation and advance the globalist cause. Now what does globalism in its current iteration look like? User FBaggins from ZeroHedge offers an intriguing alternative to globalism while at the same time accurately assessing what, exactly, the much-vaunted (by the media and political classes) globalism looks like “in motion”:
Ironically, what is necessary is that Trump tell the Zionists to FO and that he actually start colluding with Putin, in order to protect borders and save the real sovereignty of every nation in the world. Otherwise the way things are going migrants, despite how wacky the cultures they come from, will just feel entitled to move in anywhere they want to, overrunning national borders, constitutions, civil rights, properties, and pushing the citizens of the host nations aside, or obliterating them all together. No doubt to save the US economy, jobs and its integrity as a nation, tariffs are needed to balance trade deficits, and its borders have to be protected. But the US taking the lead and doing the dirty work for the Anglo-Zionist globalist-end-game to completely control the Levant with continued regime-change operations, and continued efforts to bankrupt and control Russia, only serves the globalist ends of the (Anglo-Zio) Western bankster cabal and the multinationals pulling the strings…There has to be some alternative to globalism and the insane movement for more centralized government control to deconstruct the integrity and self-determination of nations. The only real alternative to UN Agendas 2021 and 2030, to the insidious Coudenhove-Kalergi plan, to cultural Marxism, and to every other crazy scheme afoot for foreign cultures to wipe out Western civilization, is a sovereignty movement where international laws protect all nations including weaker ones from foreign exploitation and encroachment.
I’m not going to “blame” Women’s Lib on the Jews, but it’s worth noting the inventor of the birth control pill was a Jew (Gregory Pincus). Purdue Pharma, they of the criminally-negligent mis-labeled opiates and conintued mass-production of opioids, the abuse of which is resulting in at least 70,000 mostly whites deaths per year, is owned by the descendants of Jews Raymond and Mortimer Sackler. Jews account for 1.5% of the US population, but comprise just 0.3% of its armed forces. For Andrew R. Heinze:
“After 1900 Jewish thinkers—from Freud and Adler, to the 1950s popular psychology of Dr. Joyce Brothers and Ann Landers—provided a framework to shape the American psyche and ‘individual development.’ [Through these thinkers and writers] Jewish concerns and values... entered into American popular thought.”
The whole greater differences within groups than between groups idea was first put forth by Jewish Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin in the 1970s. Let’s also not forget about the disproportionate Jewish involvement in movements and/or ideologies such as New York Intellectuals, the Frankfurt School, Boasian cultural anthropologists, feminists such as Susan Sontag, multi-culturalism and pro-mass Third World immigration (from Emma Lazarus’s crew starting in 1886 until today), globalism and anti-nationalism (except for Israel), racial resentment and tribalism via the NAACP, ADL, SPLC, and other “advocacy groups,” hell, add neo-conservatism in there! Not always exclusively but certainly in some amount on all of the convergent factors that’ve helped create the “perfect storm” of the West’s accelerating suicide Bruce S. Thornton enumerates in the following quote, save our own susceptibility to be manipulated and corrupted by alien influences, you will find Jewish fingerprints:
The continuing attraction of socialism and redistributionist economies; a noble-savage multiculturalism that exalts non-Western cultures no matter how dysfunctional and illiberal, at the same time as Westerners practice a fashionable “unwarranted self-abasement,” as Churchill called it…and a dolce vita hedonism and “squalid materialism” that privilege present comfort and pleasure over the future of one’s country—cultural pathologies evident in the failure to have children, the near disappearance of God from the public square, a flabby pacifism, and the suicidal appeasement of Muslim immigrants who despise the West and seek its destruction…No one will die for the EU flag, or a shorter work week, or a longer vacation, or afternoon adultery, or more porn on the Internet…The US hosts eleven million illegal aliens, a low estimate, many of them sheltered by “sanctuary” cities embracing a naïve cosmopolitanism. And a self-loathing multiculturalism idealizes the non-Western “other,” even as it demonizes the freest…cultures in the world.
Now, it is possible as Jim Goad says to, “over-Jew it,” but goddamned if there aren’t Jewish fingerprints on a whole host of civilization-imperiling ideologies, practices, and products.
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency informs us that “the term globalist makes some Jews” uneasy. According to Bret Stephens, “‘Globalist cabal’ is an anti-Semitic dog-whistle of the first order.” The SPLC calls the phrase “globalist elites” an anti-Semitic dog-whistle. Mark Strauss claims that anti-globalism is anti-Semitism describing it as a recurrence of "the medieval image of the "Christ-killing" Jew. The Washington Post, where democracy dies in darkness, informs us that “globalist” is a euphemism for “Jew.” Sam Stein also calls “globalist” an “anti-Semitic dog-whistle.” The JC says “we need to worry when people start talking about globalists.” For Aryeh Tuchman, head of the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism:
To use that word [globalist] about a Jewish person is just really problematic. It’s a really unfortunate choice of words. ... People should be aware that when you’re using it about a Jewish person, you’re raising a whole host of associations that cannot be extricated from history of anti-Semitism.
Where could this history possibly have come from? For Andres Spokoiny:
Unsurprisingly, the dual position of the Jews makes us unpopular with the extremists on both sides of this dichotomy. For arch-universalists, our attachment to our particular identity is a sin. We refuse to quietly become a historical heritage instead of a living cultural identity; we refuse to let multiculturalism become a euphemism for assimilation; we remain attached to Zionism, our national movement; for them we are exclusionary, atavistic, and even racist. For arch-tribalists, our sin is equally grave, but it’s the inverse one: our globalism, our universalism, is unforgivable. We are apatrid; we have dual loyalties; we are never nationalistic enough… The Jewish message is that when we are true to ourselves we can be a blessing to the world. When we are what we uniquely are, we give the world what only we can give… Rosh Hashana reminds us of our particular responsibility towards the universal. 
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency highlights one of the major causes of “unease” with the term “globalist” as an economic one. The Financial Times uses “globalist” in a positive sense, and ties it inextricably to free trade (Bret Stephens has done the same in The New York Times). The ructions about “anti-Semitic dog-whistles” wholly erupted from the Left-wing media, and en masse. What’s vital to note here is that the “unease” is being expressed by the Jews themselves, who in a mass Freudian slip are outing themselves; indeed, globalist philosophies are not the sole province of Jews, although a great number have historically, and continue to, advocate for the erosion of national borders or else the fracturing of the polity expressly for their benefit. In Melanie Phillips’s piece “Globalism is not a Jewish concept,” Phillips states that:
Globalism is generally held to mean a broadly universalist approach. [Bret] Stephens interpreted it as support for free trade, immigration to America and U.S. military alliances abroad. One line in particular leapt out at me. He wrote: “Oh, and I’m Jewish. Which, some say, is what happens to globalism after it’s been circumcised.”
She correctly goes on to analyze the inherent tensions on the Left, where the particularist and insular Jews often find themselves at odds with the Corbynistas:
This is because the anti-Semitism coursing through the left goes hand-in-glove with the belief that the Western nation is the source of prejudice, exclusivism and war. The nation must therefore be overridden and neutralized by trans-nationalist institutions and universalist ideologies.
This is perhaps no more evident than the whole “Free Palestine” and Israeli apartheid “debate.” The reason this tension on the Left exists is because the Jews as collectivist are not necessarily “liberal” as we understand it, but rather contemporaneously use this ideology to further their group interests. Judaism is not necessarily inextricably intertwined with globalism exactly, but its extra-Israeli rootlessness lends itself to this particular lens as a survival strategy in a diaspora. The support for multi-culturalism is one method practiced by the Jews in order to better “disguise” themselves, but the problem with this particular strategy is that it is maladaptive as it often results in the demise of the host. It is not a sustainable strategy, particularly as many nations expressly forbid Jews from even entering (see: the Moslem world). What happens when they run out of nations to colonize? You could view the establishment of the Israeli state as the hedging of their bets, for if cosmopolitanism, which has been the hallmark of one wing of the Diaspora for millennia, fails, there is a fallback in the form of this nation-state. The insularity of the Jews in fact birthed the Ashkenazim themselves in Eastern Europe’s shtetls. There is an inherent tension within Judaism itself, perhaps owing to something within the Jewish psyche; Jews are twenty times more likely than the general population to suffer from schizophrenia. Perhaps their open-borders-for-the-West-but-not-for-Israel owes something to this dichotomous disposition. Returning to Phillips:
Jews are entitled to their nation: to identify with it, take pride in it, promote and defend it. Why, then, do so many Jews think other people are not entitled to the same? The answer is that liberal universalist Jews are threatened by the idea of the Jewish nation and frightened by the Western nation. They tend to be those who are not religiously observant. Instead, they want to subsume their identity into the prevailing orthodoxy in order not to stand out by “dwelling on the other side.” This is why the majority of British Jews didn’t support Brexit, and why the majority of American Jews loathe President Trump’s “Make America great again” agenda. Worse than that, in order to obviate any possible clash between Judaism and liberalism, such American Jews tell themselves that liberalism is Judaism. They think social conscience, caring about the vulnerable and standing up to abuses of power are “Jewish universalist” values. They are not. They are particular to the Hebrew Bible, which liberal universalism is out to destroy. The result of this liberal Jewish delusion is that Jewish identity is being hollowed out. Which is why, with the exception of the Orthodox, Jewish communities in America and Britain are going off the edge of the existential cliff.
Interestingly, the universalist policies so heavily advocated by these Jews are doing the same to the very nations they are aiding in hollowing-out. The existential crisis of Jewish identity is now endemic to the entirety of the West, where we must decide whether to lock into universalism’s genocidal embrace, or else re-establish the nation-state as the highest ideal and expression of our particular peoples. Do we allow ourselves to bear witness to “the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by Western civilization for the benefit of a rootless and nomadic international clique of conspirators” when those ostensible benefits may in fact never materialize for said clique and, ironically, be the cause of their own demise—for the Jews to be doomed by the recurrent and simultaneous re-creation of Weimar Germany across the West—or do we acknowledge that all groups have different interests, and it is to the benefit of everyone to have a homeland to call their own where they can pursue their respective destinies?
It’s also worth asking what a “universalist” success looks like for the globalists, Jewish or otherwise. Certainly in the Jewish case we know—it looks like tens of millions of corpses stacked up across the former USSR, of the concentration camps known as gulags, of people dying of starvation in the streets and living in an existential terror of the seemingly-omnipresent state. In the non-Jewish case we know as well, and it is in another irony identical but for those in power ordering the killing. So for the Left the choice is clear—Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot. Everyone, though, has an equally clear choice—globalism or hereditary nationalism, slavery and existential terror or freedom and self-determination. Choose wisely.