The Self-Genocidal Impulse: Vol. III
“Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”-Tim Wise
Tim Wise hears the empire dying from the over 95% white Tennessee town he calls home. Tough talk from a doughy panty-waist who so shamelessly panders to the Cornel West and Michael Eric Dyson types I fully expect him to get on his knees and blow one of them at any moment if he hasn’t already. The sheer vitriol of Wise’s anti-white hatred is probably taking years off his life, but he’s got a lucrative speaking career denouncing his “fellow” white brethren, so he’ll enjoy watching “our” nation go up in flames in luxury at least—and at a safe distance from all of that wonderful diversity he so cherishes. The thing is, Tim Wise isn’t actually white—he’s from the Ari Cohn School of “passing” in order to condemn whites from “within.” He cleverly sets himself up in opposition to the Historic American Nation while at the same time pretending to be of that demographic in order to take “a back road to the higher ground,” to quote the band Bitter End. Wise says that he’s specifically talking about white conservatives’ nation, and he’s right—it is dying, the nation as we knew it, the nation as it was constructed, and as it was handed down to us as our birthright:
“WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”-Preamble of the United States Constitution, 1787.
How are we supposed to square the Historic American Nation with the America of today? To quote the Honorable R. Toombs, writing in 1856:
Therefore, so far from being a necessary and proper means of executing granted powers, it is arbitrary and despotic usurpation, against the letter, the spirit, and the declared purpose of the Constitution; for its altering the Preamble exercise neither 'promotes a more perfect union, nor establishes justice, nor insures domestic tranquility, nor provides for the common defence, nor promotes the general welfare, nor secures the blessings of liberty to ourselves or our posterity,' but, on the contrary, puts in jeopardy all these inestimable blessings. It loosens the bonds of union, seeks to establish injustice, disturbs domestic tranquility, weakens the common defence, and endangers the general welfare by sowing hatreds and discords among our people, and puts in eminent peril the liberties of the white race, by whom and for whom the Constitution was made.
For Robert W. Wangrud, Randy L. Geiszler, Gerald A. Koellermeier, Sr., and Edward J. Arlt:
There is nothing evil or unfair about these sentiments for separation of races is a fundamental tenant of Biblical law (Deut 7:3-4; Num 25:6-8; Ex 34:12-16; Neh 13:25; Lev 20:24; Ezra 9:12; Ex 33:16; Neh 13:3; and, Is 13:14), and is essential to self-preservation…Consider, if any other race or nation adopted our Preamble and Constitution just as it was originally framed without additional amendments, would not the sovereigns be those who framed it?... As the total embodiment of God’s law, the Preamble and the Constitution were to be the example to the nations of the world how to bring the nations (particularly the white nations) of the world under Christian law and Christian principles. These principles, once put into effect, will utterly destroy the Babylonian political, economic, and religious system (that is the Talmudic system) of slavery which is predicated upon debt, usury, and surety (limited liability), all of which are forbidden and condemned by the law of our God…The Preamble and the Constitution were ordained and established by the white people of the United States for themselves, for their own racial government and it was done without the consent of the legislators of the several States, or the world at large.
If we take the preamble of our constitution as it is written (as we should), that this nation is for its founders and their posterity, then there is no “multi-cultural” conflict of interest—the United States is a Christian, European nation with a dominant Anglo-Saxon character in its origin, and so it should remain. The spirit of the aforementioned Biblical tenet is that each people should have a home to call their own—Kurdistan for the Kurds, Estonia for the Estonians, and America for Americans. It is both the natural and the higher order of things. Inundating someone’s home with aliens without their consent, against their wishes, and in defiance of their protest is an injustice of the highest order. As Koellermeier et al. state, “It’s no wonder this Constitution, a divinely inspired document, has been under attack from its first conception.” I also agree with the four authors that we don’t need the world’s approval for what we think is best for our own country, or that we should cater to the tastes of whatever “social justice” causes become fashionable for the Mugatu Left. We don’t answer to other men, xe’s, or zir’s, we live for higher ideals.
Back down in the terrestrial mud, politics in the current climate has become nothing but a racial head-count once you get past whites’ lifestyle, political, and ideological divisions. Only 8% of the black population voted for President Trump, as opposed to 88% for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. If that isn’t tribalism, I’d like to know what is. As the founder of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew said, “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.” It is extremely disconcerting to think that our rich Western philosophical tradition can be reduced to nothing more than “demography is destiny,” but there is ample evidence for this Biblical truth stretching into the dark recesses of human memory.
The sad truth is that the Left and their imported shock troops do not respect the fundamental freedoms of the United States, the fundamental freedoms which frankly every person is born with and on which government can only infringe. We tolerate some of this infringement for practical reasons, but there is a tipping point where the tyranny can no longer stand. Their Resistance is the Establishment incarnate. The Left is extremely generous with other people’s money; they are so virtuous and compassionate that they take money and more importantly the time it took to earn that money from me at gunpoint to fund the untold number of heads of the state apparatus hydra! They rob us blind to pay for the swaddling of their pet minorities who will one day replace us, smiling all the while, softly cooing about the rights they so benevolently grant us, not the other way around. The federal government is like an engorged tick with Lyme disease, sucking us dry to the point of bursting while simultaneously poisoning us. The government is a Kafkaesque nightmare that has somehow superseded even Kafka. You know, I really appreciate that the budget calls for our tax dollars to build 287-mile border walls in JORDAN (and Tunisia, and Egypt, and Lebanon…) but it would be nice to have one here in the U.S. Alas, it is not to be. Neil Munro writes:
The Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor, spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.
Keep that border opened wider than Stormy Daniels’s legs, boys! There’s a working class to crush! Inflation-adjusted wages have been either stagnant or declining for the bottom 50% of workers since the 1970s, and real wages have grown a pitiful 10% since 1973. Pretty much all of the wage gains are at the top of the distribution of earners. NPR, funded by your tax dollars and some of George Soros’s largesse, seems to think it’s because “high earning Boomers are leaving the workforce,” but as George J. Borjas of Harvard University writes:
It is well known that the economic benefits from immigration are the flip side of the wage losses suffered by workers. The greater the wage loss, the greater the profits to employers and the greater the benefits to those who consume the services immigrants provide…I document numerous instances where the political and media narrative that immigration is “good for everyone” is erected and maintained by questionable data manipulations, by the use of conceptual assumptions that sometimes build in the numerical answer to critical questions, and by a tendency to hide inconvenient facts. Before anyone can believe anything that advocates say about immigration, it is crucial to look under the hood and see exactly what goes into making the sausage.
Borjas generally views mass immigration as a net positive for the economy, but he will readily admit that, “Somebody’s lower wage is always somebody else’s higher profit. In this case, immigration redistributes wealth from those who compete with immigrants to those who use immigrants—from the employee to the employer.” Not only that, but in terms of re-distributive taxation, did you know immigrants use nearly 60% more food stamps than native Americans? They are also overrepresented in all other kinds of welfare usage—the kind your onerous taxes go to fund. My contention is that although GDP is a generally decent barometer of a nation’s economic health, it can be insufficient to understanding the effects on the totality of the native population itself, particularly that bottom half. I shouldn’t be worried about that, though, because from Suketu Mehta of Foreign Policy to Jewish and Israel news outlet Algemeiner to the United Nations, we are told that immigration (to the West) is inevitable! As one Twitter user put it, “If rape is sex without consent, what is mass immigration against the will of the people?” You are being ethnically and racially cleansed—a self-induced genocide framed as a moral imperative—and no amount of “tolerance” is going to save you from what’s coming. In fact, it is that exact “tolerance” that got us here in the first place.
 Isn’t it interesting that such a huge percentage of the most vociferous open borders supporters are non-white?