The Self-Genocidal Impulse: Vol. I
“Does this mean that Europe, our ‘enlightened guide,’ has already reached the summit of its evolution? Has it already exhausted its vital force by two or three centuries of hyperextension? In other words: is it already stricken with senility, and will it see itself soon obliged to yield its civilizing role to other peoples less degenerate, less neurasthenic, that is to say, younger, more robust, more healthy, than itself? In my opinion, the present marks Europe’s apogee, and its immoderate colonial expansion means, not strength, but weakness. Despite the aureole of so much grandeur, power, and glory, Europe is today more divided and fragile than ever, and ill conceals its malaise, its sufferings, and its anguish. Its destiny is inexorably working out!”-Yahya Siddyk
The gorgeous 16th century Renaissance church Chiesa San Paolo Converso in Milan has been deconsecrated and transformed into an indoor tennis court by Qatari-American Asad Raza and is being billed as an “interactive art piece” named Untitled (Plot for Dialogue). That alone is perhaps the most poignant image of where we are as a society, the perfect metaphor for the civilizational ennui that’s engulfed us and the willingness to capitulate and sacrifice that which is our most sacred, from our monuments to the few children we are willing to have.
There’s something really sick about watching whites continue to abase themselves on behalf of the diversity time bomb. I’m thinking of the family of Maria Ladenburger, the nineteen-year-old German medical student raped and killed by an Afghan “migrant” (who was curiously classed as an “unaccompanied minor” as a thirty-three-year-old man), who asked well-wishers to donate on her behalf to an NGO that actively obstructs the deportation of said “migrants” from the European Union. Or Amanda Kijera, the activist who blamed her rape in Haiti by a black man on white colonialism (she also mentioned that she was “grateful for the experience”). Or Amy Biehl, the white activist who went to South Africa to “show solidarity” with the blacks and was savagely murdered by a mob screaming anti-white epithets. The South African government pardoned the killers, claiming the violence had been “politically motivated,” and during the trial, recounts Rex van Schalkwyk, “Supporters of the…men accused of murdering [Biehl]… burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court…when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” After the acquittal, Biehl’s father shook hands with the killers and ended up employing several of them through a foundation Biehl’s parents set up in her name to advocate on behalf of “township youths.” Or the Norwegian man, Karsten Nordal Hauken, who said he felt guilty after the Somali man who raped him was deported. Or…well, you get the idea.
It’s basically unheard-of for a “migrant” to actually be deported no matter how bad the crime committed or whether they even have any legitimate business being in the country in the first place. More likely the authorities will turn a blind eye; the offender might get probation for rape or, at worst, a couple years in prison for killing someone. It’s all a “cultural misunderstanding,” you see. There is something seriously pathological about the manner in which the West conducts itself and the depths it will go to protect the very same people who want to rape and pillage it. And that’s precisely what they’re doing, with Western governments as tacit and often explicit accomplices. No rational or functional society would increase immigration or welcome untold and unvetted millions en masse from countries and cultures that are avowedly trying to kill them. In no universe does this make sense other than as a craven capitulation, a coordinated destruction of their own people, or a combination of both as I believe.
Sirhaj Wahhaj, a co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and frequent guest speaker at the “moderate” CAIR’s fundraising events, literally spells out the Islamist plan for the United States, and yet so many delusional do-gooders refuse to take him at his word:
Islam is better than democracy. Allah will cause his deen [Islam as a complete way of life], Islam to prevail over every kind of system, and you know what? It will happen. If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate. If we were united and strong, we’d elect our own emir and give allegiance to him. Take my word, if eight million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us...You get involved in politics because politics are a weapon to use in the cause of Islam (emphasis added).
He must be disaffected because of poverty or American foreign policy or something, right? British MP Naz Shah liked and re-tweeted (along with Labour Politics Zone): “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths for the good of diversity.” The British, Dutch, and German governments, among others, enforce censorship and blasphemy laws on behalf of Islam, and the supra-national governing body of the European Union is working tirelessly to crush any resistance to the mass population replacement currently underway under the veil of “compassion” or the more nebulous “benefits” of “diversity.” NGOs ferry thousands upon thousands of men across the Mediterranean to European shores before they disperse into the recesses of the continent, and millions more come by other means, but at what cost to the host nations, so charitable in throwing their doors wide open to what’s in no uncertain terms an invasionary force? The nightmare these migrants are escaping is mostly of their own design and they’re bringing that fresh hell into the bosom of the West with our aid.
The fiscal cost alone is overwhelming. It is one hundred times more expensive to house and feed a Syrian “migrant” in Sweden than it is to do the same in Jordan. On average, it is twelve times more cost-effective to re-settle a refugee in a neighboring country than to bring them to the West and afford them benefits, housing, food, et cetera. Most migrants don’t work and are a colossal drain on a country’s resources. For example, 87% of Swiss “refugees” and “asylum seekers” received benefits in the last year. Further north, though the Swedish government desperately tries to suppress any negative statistics related to their colossal migrant mistake, a recent report found that the ethnic Swedes were having to work longer hours in order to generate the tax revenue necessary to support the lush entitlements bestowed upon their future Third World masters. Indeed, they already appear to be locked into a kind of dhimmitude. Churches in cities like Gothenburg have committed themselves to sheltering migrants, and specifically barring native Swedes. Parliament recently passed a law granting preferential treatment in public housing for non-native Swedes. Denmark and Norway also have similar laws on the books. Even more disturbing, there are reports from Germany that elderly citizens have been forced by the government to give up their lawfully owned property in order to house the migrants. So much for white flight—this is white eviction. As Bruce Bawer notes:
The Scandinavian welfare states were founded on a compact between the citizens and their government: the people would pay outrageously high taxes, and in return their government would guarantee them a magnificent safety net should they get sick or get fired. But ever since these countries chose to open their doors to mass Muslim immigration, that compact has been broken…A state-employed paper-pusher who gives citizens something for which they have already paid can hardly feel particularly virtuous, whereas handing out free stuff to aliens who have done absolutely nothing to deserve it can make that same government paper-pusher feel like a world-class Good Samaritan.
That’s it, then, it’s basic Christian kindness to be giving, right? We have to help these poor, down-trodden people because they certainly can’t help themselves. Well, the Bible teaches generosity, but it also teaches self-reliance. Echoing Lao Tzu (“Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime”), generosity and charity do not always, nor should they always, come in the form of simply giving someone something, especially for nothing. Sure, if they’re freezing give them a blanket or a warm bed for the night. If they’re starving, some food. But, to quote Ephesians 4:28: “Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need.” From the Second Epistle of the Thessalonians: “For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat.” Boundless charity, as we’ve long known but seemingly recently forgotten, can not only be corrosive for the receiver of said charity, but it can be terribly self-destructive for the giver.
Beyond the overwhelming fiscal cost, the human cost has been staggering. Because of the shocking negligence the EU has shown in enforcing its borders and properly processing refugee and asylum-seeking applications, thereby incentivizing what can be at times dangerous Mediterranean crossings, thousands have died at sea. What’s more, a lucrative slave and sex trafficking trade for blacks and Christians has exploded along the migrants’ routes to the Mediterranean. There have also been a number of reports of Moslem migrants specifically targeting and murdering Christian refugees. Ideally there would be a strong deterrent and they wouldn’t come at all—only less than three percent of the current population accepted into the European Union meet the United Nations’ definition of a refugee—and given the deplorable way the migrants and refugees have conducted themselves once within the confines of the continent, the countries of Europe would be perfectly justified in not accepting a single migrant more. In fact, they ought to get to deporting the 97% that aren’t refugees post haste, but we know they won’t.
The migrants are acting perfectly rationally—after all, who wouldn’t want to escape Eritrea and Pakistan and Syria, especially when you’ll be given preferential treatment, a plethora of entitlements, and for those inclined, endless protection under the laws to rape and accost the native populace—but that does not make them refugees and it certainly does not excuse the complete disregard by the governments for the populations they are ostensibly sworn to protect. Even more egregiously, these governments, with the approval of their un-elected EU overlords, have gone so far as to dispossess and persecute their own people. The arrogance with which they operate, and the contempt they have for the native peoples of Europe, is astounding. And Allah help you, you had better not resist, or the European Commission will pass sanctions against you as in the case of nations like Poland because of their staunch refusal to accept migrant quotas.
For the native Europeans, the human costs have also been nothing short of tragic. Criminality, No Go Zones, rape, arson, terrorism, and the loss of civil liberties have accompanied a loss of national sovereignty, a collapse in social cohesion and trust, and a proliferation of bestiality brothels (no, that’s not a joke). You can’t even go to a Christmas market (sorry, a “winter parade”) unless it’s cordoned off with checkpoints and barriers, and patrolled by paramilitary units. Some municipalities are simply banning the erection of Christmas trees for fearing of “causing offense.” This is just the cost of doing business in the supra-state, multi-cultural corporate-sponsored bonanza of the future. Besides, you better be nice to the Turks and Moroccans and Syrians, because who else is going to pay your pension? On second thought, don’t answer that.
The rest of the West isn’t immune from the emotional contagion of self-destructive pathologies, either. Canada has its own set of blasphemy laws, and in the United States, putting bacon in a mosque nets you fifteen years in jail, whereas torturing a mentally challenged boy while screaming racial epithets at him and live-streaming it on Facebook isn’t a hate crime and only gets you probation…if the boy is white and you are black. If your killer is an illegal alien—the most fiercely protected class in the U.S. along with Moslems—he’ll get off on a (seven times convicted) felon in possession of a firearm charge after time served, free to roam the Sanctuary of San Francisco putting his second-grade education back to good use.
This boundless altruism for the Other comes in the form of what amounts to a trans-national Western suicide pact. This is being done to us, absolutely, but we are also allowing this to happen. Call it The Assisted Suicide of the West. In order to cover the “assisted” portion in depth, however, we must first consider our own perverse preoccupation with racial and civilizational self-destruction, and why and how we can allow ourselves to be hastened to our own demise—indeed, why we may wish for it. That is the essence of this six-part series.