It’s Electric! Or: Natalie Portmanteau
“I’ve watched the dogs of war enjoying their feast
I’ve seen the Western World go down in the East
The food of love became the greed of our time
But now I’m living on the profits of pride.”-Black Sabbath, “Hole in the Sky”
It doesn’t matter if it’s London, Berlin, Brussels, Ottawa, San Francisco, Los Angeles, or Washington, DC, the level of loathing and contempt the “elites” feel for the average citizen of their respective nations—those same nations they are working to dissolve—permeates every decision they make, every policy they push, every comment and lecture and harangue of millions of people just trying to make ends meet. Hillary Clinton’s post-election comments neatly sum up the attitude of Progressivism, Inc. regarding the inconvenient lovers of the Constitution as it was written:
If you look at the map of the United States, there’s all that red in the middle where Trump won. I win the coast, I win, you know, Illinois and Minnesota, places like that. I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. And his whole campaign, ‘Make America Great Again,’ was looking backwards…[Trump’s underlying message was] You didn’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women…getting jobs. You don’t want [to] see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are.
That’s it then, isn’t it? Not only is her first mention that of GDP, which speaks volumes in its own right, but furthermore she goes on to caricature the bedrock population of this country, characterizing them as rubes and rednecks that want women barefoot, knocked up, and in the kitchen, who want blacks back out picking cotton—not that the “red” voters had legitimate interests of their own, or that they had any objection to the demographic swamping of their country, the incestuous corruption of Washington, or the destruction of the working class. As Tucker Carlson puts it:
Democrats aren’t simply the pro-immigration party. They’ve become the anti-border party. The party opposed to citizenship itself. They don’t want the border secured. They oppose the deportation of anyone, under any circumstances, even criminal offenses. Dems believe illegal aliens accused of murder deserve protection from you more than you deserve protection from them. They care more about Ivan Zamarripa-Castaneda than they care about you. They’ll ignore and undermine federal law on his behalf. Would they do that for you? Never.
You can say the same thing about Labour, about the Liberals, about the un-elected European Union bureaucrats…take your pick. The “elites” despise the working class, but they seem to love the non-working class. 81% of Somalis in the United Kingdom are economically inactive, 88.5% of German “Muslimas” do not work (87% of migrants in general are unemployed), 90% of Dutch migrants are unemployed, 84% of Danish migrants are unemployed, and in a study of Helsinki’s migrant labor force, it was revealed that over half of Somalis and Afghanis were economically inactive, as well as 60% of Iraqis. An almost-unbelievably miniscule 0.3% of Sweden’s non-Western arrivals from 2015 have found steady employment. You’ll find similar trends across the entirety of the Western world, yet somehow the least-productive, most-criminally-inclined members of society are given the most privileged status, and if they’re Islamic terrorists, even better!,
The Democrats and the RINOs were morally bankrupt long before the budget deficit. You have Tom Perez and the typical “business needs to reflect the community” equity of outcome dross poisoning our politics, and the committed Left unnaturally manipulating the electorate through mass immigration to try and swamp any alternative but to entrench along ethnic lines. For its part, Conservatism, Inc. gets its cheap labor for when the imported millions can be bothered to work.
Instead it is the “bitter clingers” and the Little Englanders and their ilk who are the ENEMIES OF DEMOCRACY, and by God, they are going to pay for the sins of the past! Among the so-called elites, there is no respect for their fellow citizens, and no reverence for those who built their nations, or who fought and died to preserve their freedom—money talks and bullshit walks…hand-in-hand. In the United States, most of the Republican establishment is firmly committed to the Jonah Goldberg School of the “miracle” of open borders and unrestricted free trade, and they’d sell their souls for a couple of shekels. Any kind of opposition to the Democrats? Hardly.
The illusion of two choices is propped up by almost the entirety of the Establishment media—not to mention the entertainment industry and the education system, and those who do the funding—with a heavy influence not just of Jews themselves, but of Jewish concepts (such as those of Karl Marx, or the Frankfurt School in academia, or Magnus Herschfeld’s construction of the word “racism,” or Freudian psychotherapy, or Franz Boas’s cultural relativism, etc.). Revilo P. Oliver informs us that:
When the Jews invade a nation, their first concern is, as prudence demands, to acquire control over the minds of their victims. In the middle of the Nineteenth Century, Lord Harrington told Parliament that the Jews already controlled “a large portion” of the British press, and, of course, in other Aryan countries they had been equally or more successful. Less than a century later, their control over all the means of communication within every Aryan nation had become virtually absolute.
The Establishment has stigmatized healthy ethnic consciousness and nationalism for whites and foisted the artificial burden of collective guilt on Joe Sixpack, or Pierre Winebottle, or whomever, and to compound his misery, they’re doing everything they can to see him utterly erased from history. He does not have a distinct claim to his nation or even his own genome. We have since learned that the dark skin of “Cheddar Man” was an utter fabrication perpetrated by Jewish scientist Yoan Dickmann, who “revised” earlier DNA sequencing in order to arrive at this “discovery”; the goal could not be more obvious. As I wrote for Defend Europa:
After sequencing the genome and performing facial reconstruction on the fossil of 1903 finding, “Cheddar Man,” researchers now surmise that the approximately 10,000-year-old hunter-gatherer was a dark-skinned, dark-haired, blue-eyed lad in his twenties who originally came from either Africa or the Middle East—which might speak to why at least 75% of Europe’s incoming migrants are fighting-age men. Perhaps the “powers that be” anticipated this “revelation” by simply trying to recreate the phenotypical characteristics of Cheddar Man and other Mesolithic fossils found in Spain, Belgium, and Luxembourg. This is cause for celebration, because it is yet another cudgel to pound Whites with, all in the interest of dispossessing them of their ancestral homelands via a deluge of Third World immigration. Europe is going back to its roots!
The very de-legitimization of “whiteness” and ancestral claims to the European homeland serves the purpose of hacking down all defenses against complete demographic replacement. The same goes for the homelands of the European Diaspora. Until the Immigration Act of 1965 in the United States, the overwhelming majority of the country was of European origin, and immigration remained a decidedly European phenomenon as the country itself was and has always been an extension of the continent both philosophically and genealogically. Per Pew Research:
For most of the 20th century, either Germany or Italy was the top country of origin of migrants living in the U.S. A century ago, from 1890 to 1919, almost nine-in-ten foreign-born people arriving to the U.S. (88%) were coming from Europe, compared with just 12% of migrants who arrived since 1965. About 46.6 million immigrants now live in the U.S., making up a near-historic 14% of the U.S. population, according to UN data – but as of 2015, only about one-in-ten immigrants living in the U.S. (9%) were born in the EU, Norway and Switzerland.
Despite the fact that even today 50% of Americans can trace their ancestors back to the founding colonial stock, the pernicious and decidedly anti-white trope of diversity as strength has seeped into Western discourse and perception to a very worrying degree. It makes it so that Chuck Schumer’s voting against confirming Marvin Quattlebaum, a judicial nominee of President Trump’s, specifically because he is white barely register in the public consciousness, and it blinds people to the contradictions of “diversity”—some of which, in the case of Schumer and company, are intentional. Schumer stated that Quattlebaum, “speaks to the overall lack of diversity in President Trump’s selections for the federal judiciary,” but as Chris Menahan wrote, “Incidentally, Schumer had no problem with Obama nominating Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in 2016 even though it meant 4 out of 9 Supreme Court justices would be Jewish.”
40% of Guatemala’s GDP comes from remittances from workers in the United States. If immigration is so important to our economy, why are the wages of immigrant and illegal alien labor being funneled out of the country? In what way does that benefit us? The U.S. economy loses $80 billion per annum in remittances to Central and South America. Illegal immigration costs the American taxpayer a net of at least $116 billion a year (I’ve seen estimates as high as $135 billion a year). We can’t have a defended southern border even though forty-one of the top fifty most violent cities in the world are in Central and South America and despite the fact that Mexico has some of the strongest immigration laws in the Western Hemisphere. We can’t control our own demographic destiny even though Mexico—just like the United States, mind you—has an ethnic clause in its constitution.
But in the service of diversity, all of these contradictions fall away. The only thing that matters according to the official doctrine is “dismantling whiteness” and stopping racism, xenophobia, “white supremacy,” and all the other –isms and phobias wherever they may appear, from enforcing borders right down into the subconscious mind. Entire nations have proven willing to commit suicide so as to not appear bigoted.
By 2030, according to the UN’s Human Development Index, Sweden will have been surpassed by economic juggernauts such as Libya, Costa Rica, Cuba, and Mexico. Journalist Ingrid Carlqvist laments, “We had a perfectly good country. A rich country, a nice country, and in a few years’ time, that country will be gone.” Using the same UN Human Development Index, fellow migrant-friendly nation Belgium can expect to experience a similar deterioration to Sweden. It is becoming par for the course for many Western countries. The annual housing short-fall in Great Britain corresponds almost exactly to the number of immigrants and “refugees” who arrive every year. The so-called “migrant crisis” is entirely of the managerial classes’ own design. As the Western world increasingly resembles the Third World, a small cabal of string-pulling globalists stands to become unfathomably rich and powerful. But at what cost? As Dr. Andrew Joyce sharply asks:
If multi-culturalism makes our societies better why do we have more crime, less money, crippled police, stretched healthcare systems, industrial-scale rape, a fear of asserting our own culture, constant ethnic complaints, and the claim this won’t end until we are wiped out?
Why indeed Barbara Lerner Spectre and Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (Spoketh the cosmopolitan bastard: “We intend to turn Europe into a mixed race of Asians and Negroes ruled over by the Jews”)? Well then.
Do all roads lead to Jerusalem? Does the guilt of our present dire straits lie solely at the feet of the Jews? No. Beyond questioning why we seem to be uniquely susceptible to this kind of manipulation where, say, the Chinese are not is also critical, and beyond that, we would do well to understand all of the threats that imperil Western civilization; but the worst enemies are not the barbarians at the gate necessarily, but the enemies inside, ready to open that gate, be it ourselves through guilt and manipulation or those that have endeavored to manipulate us into doing so. Should that fail, the Jews have literally opened the gate from within more than a few times, from Babylon to Toledo. This particular brand of rootless, cosmopolitan Jew and their deep pathologies are principally responsible for the constant bombardment of our people with alien, anti-Western, and Bolshevik propaganda; for financial serfdom; and for all manner of disruption, unrest, paranoia, decadence, and degeneracy. The internationalist Jews—as they’ve always been—are, along with ourselves, our greatest enemy. Were our minds not so corrupted, the forces of deterioration from Islam to post-modernism would never have been able to penetrate our societies. But it is nevertheless crucial to identify the source of this self-defense-inhibiting ideological poison in order to root it out. As Marcus Eli Ravage confessed:
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.
If we can’t rouse ourselves from our collective slumber, wrest ourselves from distraction, or focus on the true threats to our people and nations, then maybe we deserve to be destroyed. Tax breaks and a strong economy are terrific, but every day that goes by while we continue to fight Israel’s wars, while we bomb the world and then invite the world, and let the judiciary and “sanctuary” cities and states run wild, every day that passes under the economic enslavement to the neo-liberal world order with our minds poisoned by propaganda, our bodies given to licentiousness and excess, is another day closer to dissolution. As Revilo P. Oliver wrote:
I do not know what, if anything, can be done to preserve a species that some judicious observers believe to be driven by a largely subconscious, but irresistible, death-wish. In 1914, although we had the Jews on our backs, we were indubitably the dominant race on earth; we are now a despised and degraded species of anthropoids on whom all other species, including the very lowest and most brutish, joyously feed. When I see that our people are either too doltish to perceive their degradation or too craven to care, I am close to despair…Are creatures that accept such degradation capable of survival or even fit to live? Is it only that they have been enslaved by foul superstitions, or have their brains been so clotted by centuries of systematic poisoning that they have been rendered permanently and irremediably imbecile?