The Jewish Kvetchion
Stevo: You’re a Nazi!
Dad: Nazi. I’m Jewish, Steven, how can I be a Nazi?
Stevo: That’s the worst. Dad, look at this. What kinda, what kinda car is this?
Dad: That would be a Porsche.
Stevo: A Porsche, that you bought at a Volkswagen dealership. Volkswagen, right? For the people who designed it? Who made that possible? Let me give you a hint: Adolf Hitler.
Dad: IT’S JUST A CAR!-Scene from SLC Punk
The Ashkenazi Jews, being at once a biological, religious, and cultural sub-group originating in the Levant but for millennia epitomizing the Wandering Jew stereotype, have now relocated mostly to the United States, but are still very much present in Europe as well as Canada and several other nations. Many hold themselves as distinct from the citizens of their host countries, their sympathies generally lying more with Israel than their present domicile, much like a renter versus a homeowner. Why don’t the Ashkenazis, out of solidarity, re-locate to the explicitly Jewish state of Israel? It is, after all, a democratic state—effectively the only one in the Middle East—and the standard of living is quite high. It’s not as if for most there would be a linguistic barrier or much of an adjustment process, either. Among like-minded people and co-religionists, their voices would figure much more prominently than in a nation of three hundred and fifty million where they are a tiny minority.
Or would they? Despite being 1.5% or so of the population, Ashkenazi Jews provide half of the Democratic Party’s funding and a quarter of the Republican Party’s. It is, of course, a measure of Jewish power and influence that the Shoah has attained such monolithic significance in our discourse whereas the Armenian genocide, perpetrated by the “liberal” Young Turks, remains but a faint whisper with no real significance, certainly not in terms of American foreign policy, and we are meant to believe it offers no insight into Moslem attitudes and historical aggression toward Christianity (remember: only the opposite is true, as you may have learned with the Crusades). Israel is an ethno-national state surrounded by hostile Islamic states on all sides, but Armenia is…what exactly? 95% of Armenians are members of the Armenian Apostolic Church, one of the oldest Christian churches in existence, founded in the 1st century AD. In the year 301, it became the first branch of Christianity to become a state religion. Surrounded on three sides by hostile Islamic states—Iran, Turkey, and Azerbaijan—the Armenian ethno-state, and its besieged neighbor Georgia, are more or less stranded in a sea of hostility with nowhere near the support that Israel has. When contrasted with Israel, Armenia is a fascinating case study in the power and influence the Jews are able to exert in shaping American policy, public opinion, and even its educational system.
For example, no one ever talks about the prominent role Jewish financiers played in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (they were 78% of ship owners) or their history as American slave-owners. The tight alliance between the vilified Apartheid South Africa and Israel is likewise virtually never noted. In Israel, illegal aliens are termed “infiltrators,” while in the Eurowestern world we are told to refer to illegal aliens as “migrants” or “undocumented persons” because “no one is illegal.” As Kevin MacDonald rather astutely points out, the West is not founded on Judeo-Christian principles, as many Jews and their dupes will claim, but only on Christian principles. Judaism has long been centered on collectivism and extreme out-group hostility, and though Judaism demands an unusually high level of critical thinking in its adherents, the ideas of universality and individual rights come exclusively from the well of Christian thought refined in the Age of Enlightenment. There is a distinctly Jewish ideology, however, and it is called Bolshevism.
In their salad days, the Bolsheviks used pogroms long since passed as justification for affecting reprisals, and under the guise of social revolution took to executing kulaks, targeting ideological foes, and forcing collectivization which precipitated the Holodomor and the deaths of twelve million Gentiles (the mostly-Jewish Cheka always took great care to protect their own). Though Joseph Stalin (himself no peach) eventually expunged the Hebraic supremacist elements from the Party, the Ashkenazi influence in the United States had concurrently begun its ascendancy, coinciding with the mutation of Marxism in the academy. Jewish intellectual Horace Kallen advanced his ideas on cultural pluralism in the United States and the re-fashioning of the nation into one without an ethnic center explicitly with the aim of maintaining Jewish group cohesion in an alien nation. Like Emma Lazarus before him, Kallen advocated strongly on the behalf of Eastern European Jews’ entry into the United States in great quantities. As I’ve previously catalogued, starting in the 1930s, the Frankfurt School and their intellectual heirs engaged in terraforming the university, particularly the humanities and “soft” sciences, creating fertile ground for the destructive ideas that would manifest themselves in the form of “critical theory.”
The following sentiments by these Jewish intellectuals are representative: Judy Finkel’s work explores, “white racial identity as a barrier to understanding diversity” and Frank Furedi believes that “whiteness is a nonsense category,” while Jennifer Roth-Gordon addresses “racial malleability” and “the centrality of whiteness” and “conservative” Bill Kristol (not the Father’s Day and City Slickers actor) once proposed we replace the white working class with cheap mestizo labor. Warren J. Blumenfeld made some crucial scholarly contributions to our understanding of “Christian privilege” and published several indispensable texts on diversity, social justice, and “cissexism.” Magnus Herschfeld is responsible for the conception of the ideological weapon known as the word “racism.” And who can forget the immortal words of Susan Sontag: “The white race is the cancer of human history.”
Kevin MacDonald, in addressing the genesis of critical theory’s organizing principles through the vehicle known as the Frankfurt School states, “At a deep level the work of the Frankfurt School is addressed to altering Western societies in an attempt to make them resistant to anti-Semitism by pathologizing group affiliations of non-Jews,” with a particular aim at conflating “membership in Christian religious sects, nationalism, and close family ties” with “psychiatric disorder.” They’ve been wildly successful. The critical theorists realized how effective psychoanalysis could be in portraying, “Anti-Semitism or other expressions of ethnic hostility as reflecting psychological inadequacy rather than real conflicts of interest.” The group interests of Jewry seldom coincide with those of Christendom, white Christendom in particular, and it was in said interests that a certain class of Jews began to foment racial animus in the United States. In MacDonald’s exceptional article, “Jews, Blacks, and Race,” he describes how the Jews essentially founded, funded, and staffed black racial advocacy organizations such as the NAACP in the express interest of fostering and promoting racial tension. To quote the communist Israel Cohen (yes, this is a real name):
“We must realize that our parties’ most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program of the communist party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the negro minority against the Whites, endeavor to instill in the Whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the negro will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”
The June 1950 issue of Jewish Life proclaimed: “Our job as Jewish Communists is to take the lead in educating the Jewish masses on the meaning of white supremacy and to enroll the Jewish community in an all-out fight against it. This is paramount in our work in the struggle for negro rights. This is vital to the struggle of the Jewish people for their own security and future.” The campaign for “negro rights” has dramatically expanded in scope to include the various multi-cultural, egalitarian, and universalist projects currently eroding the foundations of Western civilization. The prominent Jewish role in the Hart-Celler Act (usually called the Immigration Act) of 1965 and the United Kingdom’s Race Relations Act is well-known. Modern organizations such as the Swedish Paideia and especially George Soros’s Open Society Foundations are heavily invested in the push for Western multi-culturalism and open borders. Despite the noises coming from the academy and leaping off the pages of nonsense like Jezebel and Vox, “diversity” and “inclusion” are not human rights, but they are necessary to utterly swamp the West and, it would seem, ideally result in the demise or at least dispossession of the indigenous whites.
Jewish Harvard Magazine contributor and author Dr. Noel Ignatiev makes the case that we must “abolish whiteness” and that “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”; he expresses amusement at the “bewilderment from people who still think of race as biology.” By that logic, though, the Jewish people would “only” be a religio-cultural construct and as such wouldn’t have any need of a homeland any more than the Zoroastrians (or Christians). As we are seeing across the Middle East and Africa with the extermination of millennia-old Christian communities with nary a peep from the media, homelands are evidently not reserved for the abstract teachings of a particular faith (nor a certain race, but again, “race” as such is fiction for Dr. Ignatiev and his comrades, and best to stay loyal to humanity). The double standard is…curious.
To borrow a term from queer theory, Jews often “pass” as white when it is beneficial, especially as academics and public figures who “critique whiteness” on “behalf” of whites, “as fellow whites,” but they will always default to their strong in-group preferences. Jewish intellectuals, writers, activists, pundits, and other public figures have taken on an outsized role in pathologizing and damaging natural in-group preferences for whites, obscuring and manipulating cognitive and racial differences, and generally contributing to the “de-construction” of all aspects of the Historic American Nation, from its demographics to its values; this number includes, but is certainly not limited to, individuals such as Noel Ignatiev, Otto Kleinberg, Oscar Handlin, Noam Chomsky, Horace Kallen, Howard Zinn, Allen Ginsburg, Harvey Milk, Max Warburg, Ben Wattenburg, Emma Lazarus, Joel and Arthur Spingarn, George Soros, Julius Rosenwald, Bret Stephens, Saul Alinsky, Gloria Allred, Naomi Wolf, Andrea Dworkin, Leslie Feinberg, Emanuel Celler, David Petegorsky, David Axelrod, Natan Sharansky, Jennifer Rubin, Richard Lewontin, Philip Roth, most of the neocons like the Kristol’s and Jonah Goldberg, Gloria Steinem (half), Naomi Jaffe, Susan Sontag, Franz Boas, basically everyone from the Frankfurt School, the “New York Intellectuals,” Henry Kissinger, and Henry Moskowitz; Supreme Court Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Stephen Breyer; a number of “money men” who operate behind the scenes in Hollywood, the media (including social media), and the publishing industry; and, perhaps most importantly, the hugely disproportionate Jewish influence in the financial sector. The aforementioned guilty parties are all responsible for some facet of the denigration of traditional American culture, the pathologizing of European in-group preference, and for creating the conditions of financial serfdom, atomized and isolated communities, mass consumer culture in place of authentic indigenous culture, and a multi-cultural ethos that exists based on the supposition that the West is both evil and corrupted while other cultures are vibrant, colorful, and necessary to import in order to enrich ours, and to perhaps serve as our conscience. Here’s the problem with that, though, as Dr. Duke Pesta states:
All the world’s problems are blamed on the one cultural sub-set over a thousand years who made strides to fix them, and the fact that we have all this freedom and relative liberty, that’s a mark to our professors not of our success, but of our horrible failure. Who do we look to, then? Because we can’t be proud of Western culture, we have to despise it. That means we have to look to non-Western cultures, and they are as bigoted or worse than we have ever been, they are as patriarchal or worse than we have ever been, they are as homophobic or anti-transgender, or worse, than we have ever been, and they are much more religiously and socially intolerant than we have ever been, and so consequently we can’t promote ourselves, and the cultures that we have left all reify the worst aspects of what we’ve tried to get beyond.
If, as Jewess Susan Sontag posited, “The white race is the cancer of human history,” then the only cure is to eradicate it; nothing less will suffice.