s0mdqqoempexvirate0o.jpg

Hi.

Prepare your anus, you’re about to get a red pill suppository.

Bad Blood

“In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.”-C.S. Lewis

All across the Middle East and North Africa Islam bestrides the ruins of once-great empires and their people, and is today engaged in the final ethnic and religious cleansing of all the region’s diversity. Arab Moslems have replaced most of its biodiversity south of Turkey and west of Persia, and Wahabbi and Salafist Moslems endeavor to destroy not just all other religions but all other sects of Islam. The ideological and demographic war radiates in all directions, too, into Europe, India, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa, not to mention in Canada, the United States, New Zealand, and Australia. With apologies to the Druze and Ahmadiyya, Islam is a cancer, but it would not be able to spread to the West as it has if it had not been both enabled and allowed to do so, through a combination of malevolent machinations and home-grown weakness, decadence, and denial.  

Feminists make common cause with these Islamists while simultaneously endeavoring to emasculate and estrange the one group who would actually stand up for them against the coming dhimmitude: white men. One need look no further than the allegations levied against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and those levied against Keith “Hakim” Ellison, the man who symbolically used Thomas Jefferson’s Koran to be sworn into the Senate, spitting in the face of the Historic American Nation while most were too ignorant of the significance of this gesture to even realize it. Much of the problem lies in the fact that our people don’t even know who they are anymore, thanks to relentless propaganda in the media and in schools, a culture of consumerism and instant gratification, and a general dumbing-down of our discourse. We have a negative definition—we know who we’re not—and that is intolerant and able to think for ourselves. “Bigotry has no place here”…unless it’s directed at straight white males and, increasingly, straight white women. Now that the demographic replacement is approaching its advanced stages, the white women who haven’t become bloated grotesqueries, rug-munchers,[1] or trannies are now of no further use to the “Coalition of the Fringes”—just ask the New York Times (and pay special attention to *who* wrote that article and whose *interests* they might represent).

For now the gays and bi and trans and species-less have a home simply because the creation of still more grievance groups with which to hound and pound the (shrinking) beleaguered American majority is beneficial to the “elites.” One’s sexuality does not constitute an identity group any more than “trans” constitutes a legitimate identity. Say this to a Leftist, though, and prepare to be burned at the stake! As Revilo P. Oliver wrote:

Although the “liberal” and Marxist cults have doctrinal differences as great as those that separate Lutherans from Baptists, they are basically the same superstition, and whether or not we call them religious depends on whether we restrict the word to belief in supernatural persons or extend it to include all forms of blind faith based on emotional excitement instead of observed facts and reason. When those “atheistic” cults scream out their hatred of “Fascists” and “Nazis,” they obviously must believe that those wicked persons are possessed of the Devil and should therefore be exterminated to promote holiness and love. And when they sees “racists,” who impiously substitute fact and reason for unthinking faith in approved fairy stories, their lust to extirpate evil is as great as that of the Christian mob that dragged the fair and too-intelligent Hypatia from her carriage and lovingly used oyster shells to scrape the flesh from her bones while she was still alive (my note: there is an indictment of de-racinated Christianity here as well, a critique that can be found in some of my other writings; such considerations are vital, but are only tangentially germane to the present point).

The Left is animated in no small part by a religious fanaticism identical to that which drives Moslems to stab, butcher, shoot, and self-detonate in the name of Allah. They are possessed with an unshakeable belief in the rightness of their ideology, so much so that they are willing to go to violent extremes to further its ends. The key difference between the two, however, is that while Moslem fundamentalists will willingly die for their beliefs, most Leftists will not. They are cowards, but cowards are also very dangerous, just in a different way. Their duplicitousness matches the “stealth jihadi,” but in their desire to avoid harm, they will sacrifice anyone and anything before themselves. We cannot even say that they are operating from animal instinct, for their perversions and cravenness are an affront to the natural order of things. Only in such a state as has now been created can such vermin be allowed not only to survive but to flourish. They insulate themselves from consequence on the backs of lies and deceit, and they exploit the mad passions of the mob, that unthinking mass susceptible to the stoking of resentments and petty jealousies, so quickly turned murderous. As Polybius wrote in his Histories:

When a commonwealth, after warding off many great dangers, has arrived at a high pitch of prosperity and undisputed power, it is evident that, by the lengthened continuance of great wealth within it, the manner of life of its citizens will become more extravagant; and that the rivalry for office, and in other spheres of activity, will become fiercer than it ought to be. And as this state of things goes on more and more, the desire of office and the shame of losing reputation, as well as the ostentation and extravagance of living, will prove the beginning of a deterioration. And of this change the people will be credited with being the authors…They will refuse to obey any longer, or to be content with having equal powers with their leaders, but will demand to have all or far the greatest themselves. And when that comes to pass the constitution will receive a new name, which sounds better than any other in the world, liberty or democracy; but, in fact, it will become that worst of all governments, mob-rule.[2]

Order is so difficult to maintain, and chaos so quick to consume and destroy. Africa is in a state of seemingly-infinite regress because its people do not have the capacity to produce, let alone be stewards of, civilization. The state of savagery in the inner cities of the West is the disgraceful product of allowing feral Third Worlders to first take residence within our nations and secondly to allow them to accost our people and destroy our societies from within by this fever dream of “equality,” which betrays itself by advancing the ill-equipped beyond their station and holding contempt for the true bearers of civilization. This madness can only end in factionalized violence and tribalism if the current trajectory is maintained. This is the time for solutions, not feckless platitudes and opprobrium by “conservatives.” To quote Whittaker Chambers, “[The West is] a creative force…whose mandate…impels men to die for it, not because they wish to die, but because they feel its shaping power so completely that they would rather die than live without it.” Modern conservatism is just a way to lose more slowly. Mob-rule—ochlocracy—is the inevitable product of a diverse “democracy” comprised of idiots. Set loose on their fellow citizens, the mob does the dirty work while the “elites” remain ensconced in power. As John Stuart Mill presaged in the mid-19th century, there is perhaps no greater tyranny than that of the ochlocractic majority:

Like other tyrannies, the tyranny of the majority was at first, and is still vulgarly, held in dread, chiefly as operating through the acts of the public authorities. But reflecting persons perceived that when society is itself the tyran—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it—its means of tyrannizing are not restricted to the acts which it may do by the hands of its political functionaries. Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself.

Even if it were not a majority, it could be a majority of voters (which the Electoral College is meant to guard against, for example) or a sufficiently active and vocal minority who exert pressure on one’s personal life, place of employment, et cetera. Additionally, this kind of invasive tyranny need not just limited to a body of people. We see corporations engaging in this kind of behavior all of the time. In many ways the multi-nationals are a greater threat to our freedom than the government. Anywhere power is concentrated, there is great potential for abuse. This was one of the great insights of the Founding Fathers, who specifically structured our government to avoid this.

On an international level, most of the member states of the United Nations fill the role of the defective, the degenerate, and the alien in our “democracy,” exploiting our insane inclination to grovel and degrade ourselves on behalf of fantasies of equality for their own gain. The natural aristocracy of mankind voluntarily offers itself to be stripped bare and plundered believing this somehow contributes to the universal betterment of humanity. As Revilo P. Oliver wrote:

Is it possible that we, men of the West, members of the only race that has had the intelligence and discipline to master many of the powers of nature, are too stupid to preserve our own civilization? Is it not fantastic that we, who alone can create such intricate mechanisms as electronic computers and automatic factories, should so demean ourselves as to grovel among savages in the filthy hole called the “United Nations”? That we, who have mastered the atom and hold in our hands the lightning of nuclear power, should cower before the brutish hordes of Genghis Khan—cower in the insane act of handing our weapons to our eternal enemies? That we, who alone of all races can look far into the infinite universe and can now measure with precision the vast quasars that lie at the unimaginable distance of six billion light-years, should enslave ourselves to creatures whose rudimentary minds can never truly comprehend the simple principles that we learn in childhood? Those are the questions that every man must answer for himself now.

Universalism, egalitarianism, equality—these are products of a child’s imagination at best, the delusions of a madman or the ramblings of a fanatic at worst. The madman, the zealot, or the helpless child—all are enfeebled, weakened, exposed, and ultimately defenseless to the predations of the world (the deleterious effects of social gospel Christianity and Christian universalism certainly applies here). One does not voluntarily climb into a den of vipers otherwise.


[1] “75% of all lesbians were overweight or obese. In fact, they found lesbian women were more likely to be overweight and obese compared to any other female sexual orientation group.”: https://www.medicaldaily.com/obesity-epidemic-gay-bisexual-women-get-healthy-391397

[2] http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text.jsp?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0234%3Abook%3D6%3Achapter%3D57

Trivial Pursuit

Trivial Pursuit

Israel: A True Nation of Immigrants

Israel: A True Nation of Immigrants